15 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHKoni Sport Vs Bilstein B6/B8
Reported or suspected cause
ground clearance
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
To adjust rebound through the **** on the top, you have to remove the trip around the battery for the front pair, which isn't tough with the right torx bit.
Leading evidence: 'ground clearance' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'ground clearance' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Adjust rebound through the ****' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
The fit/finish was really impressive; they installed just like the original shocks with absolutely no fitment issue.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I'm running koni sports on US m030 springs which is only a bit lower than stock.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
The car is used for about 4-5000 miles a year, summer use, normal roads, no track time.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Adjust rebound through the ****
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
To adjust rebound through the **** on the top, you have to remove the trip around the battery for the front pair, which isn't tough with the right torx bit.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T135432Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I'm slowly gathering all the bits needed to refresh my suspension and lower the car.
So far I have:
- 4 new coffin arms (OEM)
- Two new front top mounts (mine are a little worn, rears are fine)
- H&R Lowering Springs
Next purchase will be shocks.
The car is used for about 4-5000 miles a year, summer use, normal roads, no track time.
I'm torn between Koni Sport's and Bilstein B6/B8. Gert at Carnewal ruled out the Koni FSD are they are not recommended for lowering with H&R's.
Can everyone who runs Koni Sport or Bilstein B6 or B8 shocks please give me a review of what they are like? I'm used to lowered cars, and I know they will be stiffer, but I want shocks that will improve handling without compromising ride quality too much.
Thanks
Keith
I'm running koni sports on US m030 springs which is only a bit lower than stock.
To adjust rebound through the **** on the top, you have to remove the trip around the battery for the front pair, which isn't tough with the right torx bit. For the rear you have to remove the rear subwoofer if you have Bose, which again requires a torx bit and some patience.
On full soft, they are more comfortable than the m030 were. Towards the stiffer end they make the car much more responsive but would be pretty brutal for city driving. Rear rebound adjustment makes a big difference in how "loose" the car handles.
The koni sports are nice if you have access to a shock dyno prior to install, or are into tuning the handling (for autocross, etc). If you don't want the adjustability, just put them at full soft and they're pretty good. The fit/finish was really impressive; they installed just like the original shocks with absolutely no fitment issue.
Thanks for the advice, they sound a good option.
Gert at Carnewal said B6 would suit the application, but I see the B8's are shorter and will probably go for them.
Anyone got B6 or B8 installed? Ride quality?
I can't speak directly in terms of 996 but I've had both on at least a half dozen cars in the past.
In general Bilstein's are inverted monotube high pressure shocks so they will ride a touch harsher than the Koni's but in return will last longer and their shock dampening will not fall off gradually like the Koni's.
I agree with knfeparty about the Koni's. I was surprised at the fact that an aftermarket "sport" shock can also offer an even better ride experience than factory shocks(on full soft). If you do a search, you'll be able to find shock dyno comparisons between Koni's and other brands and you can clearly see that the Koni's offer a broad and very refined dampening over a wide range of surfaces.
In my experience, if your car is a DD and you do a handful of track events on the Koni's, don't expect them to last more than 3-4 years max at optimimum performance levels. They will work but the dampening performance will have been degraded.
So botttom line is it boils down to combination of ride preference, adjustability, warranty.
BTW, definitely get the Bilstein Sports(B8's) if you are going to be using lowering springs.
The car is for fun, weekend drives, good weather, but when I spend money on anything I want it to last. They are roughly the same price.
I've had both on other cars before also, but its a small 1985 hatchback (UK car), and found both to be fairly stiff, but this is more down to old suspension technology and the type of car, and fact they were lowered 60mm+.
Keith
i've been on H&R with B8's for a few years/70k miles or so now...
I do city/hwy mostly daily with no issues. It's been a while so I can't even remember what stock feels like so I can't really give a comparision...
this is all i have showing height. Keep in mind that mine sits a little HIGHER...5mm?10mm?
as it's a 99 (lightest year I believe) and weight reduction....stock weight 996 would sit a little lower
Thanks,
As far as I'm aware, H&R have two sets of springs, -25mm and -30mm, I went for the -30mm. Your's sits nice, it makes them look more purposeful!
Cheers
Keith
I'm running tech art springs with bilstein B8. Ride is surprisingly smooth and not harsh at all. I'm living in Michigan; the potholes capital of the United States.
Ride quality is impressive, better than stock. No wallowing and sharp bumps when hitting potholes.
With ROW sway bars, the body roll is reduced significantly and also the nose dive during hard braking.
Mu only issue is ground clearance. With front tire spoiler, you will scrape them. I lost both of my tire spoiler driving through my driveway.
I have B8 shocks and I think they are great for DD, De & autocross.
They are a few folks who have posted on B8 shocks and every opinion seems to be the same, great.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.