43 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHThinking about Tires
Leading reported evidence
Install there
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I actually drove over to the Tire Rack store in South Bend and had them installed there.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
meanwhile the car is down till I get this fixed...I limped home at 30 mph as a roadside check revealed nothing, but the jack stand test was more revealing!!!
Leading evidence: 'Install there' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'heat in the warehouse, or something else' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Check revealed nothing' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
I don't know if it was the heat in the warehouse, or something else.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
meanwhile the car is down till I get this fixed...I limped home at 30 mph as a roadside check revealed nothing, but the jack stand test was more revealing!!!
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Are you actually using MSN Explorer as your web browser?
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Check revealed nothing
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
meanwhile the car is down till I get this fixed...I limped home at 30 mph as a roadside check revealed nothing, but the jack stand test was more revealing!!!
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
43 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Outcome without a verified action link
meanwhile the car is down till I get this fixed...I limped home at 30 mph as a roadside check revealed nothing, but the jack stand test was more revealing!!!
Yup... Time....
Started to get a pretty bad vibration today on the way home, jacked it up and checked it out.... good news, bad news....
Tire is shot, didn't pop, didn't cause an accident, wheels look true....
Yippy ! new tires !!!!
I will order 4 from tire rack.... the Sumitomo HTR Z III's
meanwhile the car is down till I get this fixed...I limped home at 30 mph as a roadside check revealed nothing, but the jack stand test was more revealing!!!
I want to know how you like them. I've decided to stick with the PS2s. It's a devil I know (and trust my neck to) on the track (without having to bring track tires with me).
I dont know $1328 for PS2's ----- $1120 for RE050A'a ----- $580 for the HTR ZIII's
100% ---- 98% ----- 93% respectively
Its hard to imagine that for my driving style and linited amount of track days I will realize twice as much tire (or more) out of the other brands.....
I mean look what I was on!!!
Yep - anythings better than what you've got! I hear ya about spending twice as much for maybe 5 or 10% better performance... But I feel that I *will* notice a difference on the track, so I'm OK with the expense.
Another example is brake pads... I spend an awful lot of money on very specialized pads - but I've been dissatisfied with lesser pads, so it's money well spent for me.
It's a beautiful day here - I'm looking forward to a nice drive! (Going to visit a friend about an hour away to help him reassemble a 365 BB!!)
I've got about 3,000 miles on my HTR Z IIIs. I actually drove over to the Tire Rack store in South Bend and had them installed there. I am very pleased with them. They are very smooth and quiet. I haven't been on the track with them, however everything I have read indicates that they'll be a bit of a disappointment on the track compared to proper N-spec tires.
well I supose if they suck I could always re-sell them for some % of what I paid and buy the N-specs. Might loose a few bucks and chalk it up to "experience" -
I think the Sumi III are great for the buck. I had DE at Road America last week and the tires did great! 135 coming into to turn 1 and taking it at 90 felt good. I think you will be pleased.
I have the Sumi III's on my car. My indy shop lost his mind when he found out that I was not putting PS2's on the car. I have no problems with them at all. Also consider that I am a casual driver with no intention on going to the track.
With shipping the Sumi's were $630. I personally cannot justify 2x the price for the PS2's.
Okay, so the Sumi's are Y rated, what negatives have people voiced about them?
I see some pretty good positives listed above, so I'm left scratching my head as to where they might bee lacking - other than bias towards PS2s.
Holy smokes, Ivangene. Are you actually using MSN Explorer as your web browser? Definitely get yourself Google Chrome installed. You don't know what you are missing.
Hard to cover wires when you have that much equipment packed in there.... dual monitors, 4TB raid array, 1TB scratch drive, speakers, scanner, label printer... and that doesn't even cover thee stuff that is USB and Firewire powered.
The wires may be ugly, but the machine kicks the butt of anything else on the market right now.
And
Its BIG
Hahaha
I built my computer from a pile of trash, its a P4 3.6 with 2 gig ram and 180gb HD. I spent less than $150 including the 19" LCD so even though its slow, it was cheap AND serves purpose for now. When and if it dies I won't do it this way again, but it was fun. Trouble is it keeps running. It looks like frankenstein too, but at least that GT2 cup car front spoiler looks good on it.
Hahahhaha
Well, it has to be big to fit in the 2 internal drives of 1TB each and the 8 CPUs.
It fits 32GB of RAM and 4 internal drives, but I'm not yet up to capacity.
I do a lot of video and photography work, so there's no such thing as too much computing power.
Need more power!
To be honest, that's what I expected people to see in the photo. I love that model.
I have that white Cup car and a Mk1 996 GT3 with racing decals that I've not yet managed to find a home for since the second monitor evicted it from the desk.
I went with these
LINK
they came in this morning, I ran my wheels down, they had them done by lunch, picked them up and they are sitting in the back of my suburban..... cant wait to get home and put them on the car!!!
well, I can honestly say (in my case) these tire made a HUGE differance!
So I put a quick 10 miles on them, they are everuthing you would expect in a brand new tire....now we drive the wheels off it and see how the do as they grow older...I have an autocross on the 13th i might try and make....I need about 500? miles by then? --- enough talk, time to drive!
on a side note, the tires I had on the car came with it. I asked my tire/alignment guy if they went out from age or from driving style (ie I did something wrong) We had been watching this tire for a while as it had a "funny spot" on the bead...when we looked inside the inner cords on the bead had came apart and rusted (from age he says) and there was a huge separation in the tread area. So for kick he flips the tire over and asks how old they are.... pthhh I dont know.....he looks at the numbers for a minute, counts up and say "holy **** these are 14 years old!!"
Now I am not going to say this is true, but this guy is very good and heavy into racing and tires...so if it is..WOW...they must have came from somewhere second hand before I got the car. Sneaky seller, or he just got a good deal and they lasted long enough... either way, I fell pretty happy having tires on the car that are from this millenium !!
Interesting comment about the age of tires.
A few years ago I participated in an event called the Saab Aero Academy at Road Atlanta in Georgia. We basicially ran stock Saab 9-5 Aeros through a closed course, much like a DE event. Over the course of the 3-day event, each Saab essentially burned through a set of tires. At this particular event, we had a rare opportunity to compare tires on the road course, on essentially the same vehicle.
I drove a car with new Pirelli P-Zero Rossos, a car with worn Pirelli P-Zero Rossos and a car with "new" Pirelli P-Zero Rossos that had been sitting in the back of the warehouse for a couple of years in a corner. They had never been mounted on a wheel, but they were a couple of years old. These "new" tires were the worst of the bunch, by a large margin. I was actually shocked at the difference. I don't know if it was the heat in the warehouse, or something else. Whatever caused it, it taught me that age does affect rubber, as well as mileage/usage.
BTW - if any of you ever purchase a Saab Aero, make sure to participate in the Academy. It's free to Aero owners, and well worth the time.
According to Tire Rack, they are "asymmetrical" - meaning one side should be on the "outside" of the rim, but they are not directional - meaning they can be mounted on either side of the car.
OK I saw the "outside" and I was on the last tire when I thought "Oh sh*t!, did I put these on the right side?"
I must have stared to the sidewalls for 10 minutes looking for an arrow...hahaha, I have some stuff to do today with the truck but I am going to push it out till tomorrow so I can put some miles on the car... I miss it since its been down a week and the weather has been AMAZING!!
It's usually good to get at least 100 miles on a tire before pushing it for grip. They tend to be a little greasy until the tread gets some grain to it. Try accelerating on a new rear tire on a motorcycle, and you'll find out VERY quickly just how much of a difference it makes. Also, probably heat cycle has something to do with it - I'm no expert, just offering some first hand experience.
New tires will have a slippery chemical on the tread, which is a releasing agent used to help the tire slide out of the mold. It will take a number of miles for this to wear off.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.