19 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHMistake avoidance ...I hope
Leading reported evidence
Use didn't count
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I knew it was immaculate so the second time you saw it used didn't count.
Leading evidence: 'Use didn't count' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check pan underneath and the fit of the doors' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Did you check the pan underneath and the fit of the doors to look for accident damage.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
however the car is orginally from Boston and the current owner has had it for the past 7 years...he has kept maticulous records and has performed all recommended maintance.
Replace within the last 5k miles where all seals were
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I made the purchase and against...all ...i didn't go for the ppi...yet man it has all turned out well...the clutch was replaced within the last 5k miles where all seals were replaced...no rms problems!!!...brakes were done within past 2k miles and within last 5oo miles all fluids changed...oil done and well whats left...lol...the previous owner kept the car in impeccable shape...and one would think that it just rolled off the showroom floor...i've only driven it about 50 miles so far...but a hell of a machine...after having owned a 95tt rx7, that was in great shape...a 91 nsx that was extremely nice...this one takes the cake...im glad i had those before making this move...the machine is trul
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
however the car is orginally from Boston and the current owner has had it for the past 7 years...he has kept maticulous records and has performed all recommended maintance.
Replace within the last 5k miles where all seals were
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I made the purchase and against...all ...i didn't go for the ppi...yet man it has all turned out well...the clutch was replaced within the last 5k miles where all seals were replaced...no rms problems!!!...brakes were done within past 2k miles and within last 5oo miles all fluids changed...oil done and well whats left...lol...the previous owner kept the car in impeccable shape...and one would think that it just rolled off the showroom floor...i've only driven it about 50 miles so far...but a hell of a machine...after having owned a 95tt rx7, that was in great shape...a 91 nsx that was extremely nice...this one takes the cake...im glad i had those before making this move...the machine is trul
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
19 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T020439Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I am on the verge of making my first P purchase...a long awaited event. But as I have read...due diligence is not only prudent but without can be quite costly...so maybe this question is not necessary so hit me with your responses. I have found a 2000 c4 911 with 46K original miles...in emaculant condition...with everything working properly. however the car is orginally from Boston and the current owner has had it for the past 7 years...he has kept maticulous records and has performed all recommended maintance. I wanna jump on this purchase and am considering not getting a ppi..what do you recommend. Thanks for your responses. Oh yeah paying $25,000
Why would a couple bucks spent ona PPI not be well spent even if nothing turns up?
That said, I bought mine w/o and inspection and it has been ok so far. I would not repeat that though with the slightest bit of knowledge that I now possess. Not worth the gamble and it doesn't cost much.
Just get it the PPI, buy the car and post some pics already
Well, not having a PPI means you trust yourself to determine if the car is genuinely emaculant. How well do you know cars? Did you look underneath for oil leaks? Did you check the pan underneath and the fit of the doors to look for accident damage.
Did you go through the maticulous records to see what was done and when? Has it ever has a clutch? When were the brakes last done?
Price-wise you're about right, maybe a hair high. Do you really want/need a C4 ? Are the colours pefect? What kind of wheels are on the car, what condition are the tires ?
If any of these questions give you pause for thought, then get a PPI. Otherwise, have at it.
Good luck.
Emaculant? I don't know that word... but now I've seen it used twice. Do you mean immaculate or emaculate, or is emaculant actually a word and I don't know it?
Anyway... I would get a PPI. It could be the best $300 you spend. When I bought my 996, I paid for a PPI and it showed roughly $2,600 worth of work needed to be done, including a new RMS and IMS. The seller split it with me, so my $300 investment saved me $1,000.
Thanks everyone for your comments..oh yeah...i forgot to mention that Im a math teacher and sometimes spelling..well lets just say it falls by the wayside...immaculent.?.i think thats how u spell it....the ppi will be done...i just get so excited when buying a new toy that sometimes my mind goes to mush...i have always been fortunate in the past with the purchases of 1995 tt rx7 and 1991 nsx...maybe this time i should take exception...
I knew it was immaculate so the second time you saw it used didn't count. I just though it rolled off the tongue better, as did our math teachin' buddy.
For the record it's meticulous and not maticulous also.
Back to the C4 purchase. Do *not* let your heart beat your head to the punch. One of the cars I looked at when shopping recently had been bent and fixed/painted. It wasn't hard to tell, but you did have to look and the seller wasn't going to tell me until I pointed it out and then it was "oh yeah, there's a 12thousand dollar hit on the car, but for a Porsche that's nothing.
Yeah right...loser.
I think it is macculate....... who cares we all know what he meant... I didn't do a PPI (and should have.....but after 4 years and about 30K miles under my foot, I can't complain --Knock on wood)
Ofcourse 300 bucks is the cheapest protection....but then again, do they really see/hear everything?!?! whe they do a PPI...they should, but do they???
I made the purchase and against...all ...i didn't go for the ppi...yet man it has all turned out well...the clutch was replaced within the last 5k miles where all seals were replaced...no rms problems!!!...brakes were done within past 2k miles and within last 5oo miles all fluids changed...oil done and well whats left...lol...the previous owner kept the car in impeccable shape...and one would think that it just rolled off the showroom floor...i've only driven it about 50 miles so far...but a hell of a machine...after having owned a 95tt rx7, that was in great shape...a 91 nsx that was extremely nice...this one takes the cake...im glad i had those before making this move...the machine is truly a beauty and a keeper for a long time..2000 blk/blk c4 with 46k miles...and the summer is just beginning....thank you guys for your imput..now i gotta find one for my girl and a good friend...hahaha...they would be so fortunate...
Welcome to Rennlist and congrats! It is customery for Newbies to post pic of they car , so consider this to be your "Newbie Initiation."
Come on Newbie, post the !@#$%&* pics!
its friday - by sunday we expect pics or you could be banned
go ahead, drive it all day saturday....clean it, look in the garage a dozen times but for goodness sakes...SHARE !!!!
hahahahaha