fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Jacquemond : Qualtiy of our parts

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
6 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHJacquemond : Qualtiy of our parts

Reported or suspected cause

nicest set we did

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause · Original poster

the Absolute wide body set is probably the nicest set we did for 996.

Original post Read captured discussion
Jacquemond : Qualtiy of our parts
Frequently discussed work

Set we did

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

the Absolute wide body set is probably the nicest set we did for 996.

Original post Read captured discussion
Jacquemond : Qualtiy of our parts
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'nicest set we did' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'nicest set we did' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Set we did' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 6 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Set we did

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

the Absolute wide body set is probably the nicest set we did for 996.

Original post Read captured discussion
Jacquemond : Qualtiy of our parts
Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Set we did

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

the Absolute wide body set is probably the nicest set we did for 996.

Original post Read captured discussion
Jacquemond : Qualtiy of our parts
Reported and suspected causes (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

nicest set we did

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that suspect a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suspected cause · Original poster

the Absolute wide body set is probably the nicest set we did for 996.

Original post Read captured discussion
Jacquemond : Qualtiy of our parts
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

6 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T152433Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Hi We just added a video and few pics to show you the quality of our parts. Please have a look at http://www.jacquemond.com/indexuk.htm You ll see that when we talk about high quality, this is not a joke ! Bye. Olivier www.jacquemond.com

POST 2Original post

Quotes source post: 6616134

it is without prices...........

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

well we updated the page of wings/spoilers, ... with a price list, now ! for wide body sets, prices are more expensive, and customers prefer that other visitors dont know prices they paid for their set. Bye Olivier Jacquemond www.jacquemond.com

POST 5Original post

Olivier, again thanks for teasing me........My mouth waters over the look of both of these Wide body kits. They look fantastic Total997-09 LTD Edition and the Absolute I personally would luv to see the Total997-09 LTD Edition with the rear center cut exhaust. I am sure I would probably have to win the lottery to afford these though.

POST 6 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

the Absolute wide body set is probably the nicest set we did for 996. ( With ArtWork for Turbos... ) We wont do the TOTAL997-09 Limited edition with central cuts for pictures on the website. But, we can produce a special set for you ! Well we have a production session planned next week, and for us this is always better to produce more parts in as long as molds are out, then, if you wish to get an Absolute set or a TOTAL997-09 one, please email me directly on [email removed] , and I ll offer you a crazy price for a quick order ! and you ll own one of the nicest 996 of your area !!! Olivier www.jacquemond.com

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.