fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

X51 or Not

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
26 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHX51 or Not

Reported or suspected cause

a/c condensor resevoir

Reported cause

No successful repair reported for this finding.

1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that report identifying a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Reported cause · Original poster

The damage was caused by the A/C condensor resevoir.

X51 or Not
Frequently discussed work

Fill miles

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

I have driven many 911, and I have had the 40th Anniversary car for 2 months and 1800 fun filled miles.

X51 or Not
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'a/c condensor resevoir' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'a/c condensor resevoir' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Fill miles' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 26 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 3 other evidence results

Fill miles

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

I have driven many 911, and I have had the 40th Anniversary car for 2 months and 1800 fun filled miles.

X51 or Not

Replace )

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Just My Two Cents, Keep the change :-)

X51 or Not

Use noticably more fuel

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

The X51 also uses noticably more fuel.

X51 or Not
Frequently discussed actions (3)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Fill miles

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

I have driven many 911, and I have had the 40th Anniversary car for 2 months and 1800 fun filled miles.

X51 or Not

Replace )

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Just My Two Cents, Keep the change :-)

X51 or Not

Use noticably more fuel

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

The X51 also uses noticably more fuel.

X51 or Not
Reported and suspected causes (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

a/c condensor resevoir

No successful repair reported for this finding.

1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Reported cause · Original poster

The damage was caused by the A/C condensor resevoir.

X51 or Not
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

26 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T113718Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I know this has been covered previously, but as I am making my final decision on my replacement 911 from Porsche (do to the water damage in my current 40th Anniversary car) I have a few questions regarding the performance differences between a C4S and a 40th Anniv. Car. Obviously, the C4S is a better all-year-round car and it has its handling benefits, but in terms of engine performance, am I going to miss the 40th with the x51 power package in day-to-day driving?? I do not track the car, but I do drive aggressively.

POST 2Original post

can you get a 997? a lot more torque than an x51 and more power too.

POST 3Original post

I think you're referring to the 997S which has a 10 hp and about 20 lb-ft engine advantage over the X-51 equipped 996. Jaws, the two models feel very different when driven aggressively. This is more due to the AWD system and weight of the C4S than the X-51 of the 40th. It is a very subjective comparison. I chose the 40th because of it felt lighter and quicker to respond to my steering inputs. The C4S felt more stable and secure. Both cars are insanely fast. You can't lose either way. Have you had a chance to drive a C4S?

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I have driven many 911, and I have had the 40th Anniversary car for 2 months and 1800 fun filled miles. I have driven a C4S 1x in traffic and it was a Tip (I would only get the 6 spd.) so I did not really get a feel for the car. I know that living in the NE the C4S is a more "practical" option. My real question is will I feel the power difference in day-to-day driving??

POST 5Original post

The X-51 option moves the power band higher up the rpm curve so around town a X-51 car will be hard to distinguish from a standard car.

POST 6Original post

The Short and Skinny - YES you will miss the power. Just My Two Cents, Keep the change :-)

POST 7Original post

This power band crap is bull****... the X51 is noticably faster than a stock car and certainly faster than the heavier and slower albeit lovely looking C4s....as rjmdad996 says you WILL miss the power the 997 has more torque and power than the anniversary car but power to weight is the same and as the 997 is heavier it must feel slower off the mark ...what about a 997C2s that would be my choice

POST 8Original post

Yep, if you drive "aggressively" you will almost certainly miss the power of the X51

POST 9Original post

Man, you guys must be standing on the gas pedal at every greenlight and revving up to 7k rpm. Power = torque. X51 torque=std torque. X51 Power band moves up = less mid range power. Humble opinion: assumong you can feel the small differences, not only will you NOT miss the power, the X51 may feel like LESS power in daily driving due to the power band moving higher up in the rpm scale

POST 10Original post

Have you driven an X51 car for any period of time?

POST 11Original post

As usual it all depends, and everyone is entitled to what they prefer. When I had my 3.2 I drove a 993/4 through Switzerland several times. Just plain dull compared to the 3.2. When I came to purchase my 40th I drove a C4s quite aggressively. Hands down the 40th was more fun. I don't care if the engine is not much stronger (butt says it is), its a joy to listen to and rev. And the 40th gives you room to grow. I still love being surprized by that little bump right at the apex of a long steep downhill entrance ramp I know of.

POST 12Original post

Jaws, get another 40th so we can all shut up.

POST 13 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I appreciate all of the feedback I have received from all of you and it has helped in making my decision. I have decided to go with the C4S for a variety of reasons. They are as follows: - After spending time in the C4s, there was not a noticable difference in acceleration or engine performance. The only real difference was over 6800 RPM, and it was negligable. - Living in NJ, the C4S is more practicle for year round use. - Long-term value is stronger (higher residual) with the C4S. - The widebody I will miss the "bling-bling" rims and badging, but the C4S has quite a few cosmetic options (small aluminum, supple leather, bose & changer, exhaust tips) so it became a non-issue. I am picking up my new baby on Friday. - Still 1 year (at least) before replacement model compared to the August 28 release of the 997.

POST 15Original post

Yeah!! Don't forget to buy snow tires so you can enjoy it year round.

POST 16Original post

Good choice. i know you said you don't track the car, but the C4S is an exceptional track car and easy to drive fast. Those big red brakes let you brake later and deeper. The AWD just simply sticks and rotates the car. Apex and exit speeds of the C4S give it a headstart on the straightss that make up for the monster HP cars like the Z06. Enjoy!!!

POST 17Original post

I think you made the right choice...I KNOW I did, and I too bought it to drive in all-weather. Enjoy!

POST 18 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

My dealer called me today to let me know that Porsche declined to allow me to get the C4S because it did not have the same value as my 40th. I am now getting another 40th, which is great, but I was ready to pick-up the C4S tomorrow. The strange thing is that Porsche said no because the 40th is expected to be worth $5k-$6k more at lease end, so the C4S was not enough $$$ for a substitution of collateral.

POST 19Original post

That's interesting but are you comparing 2 '04 cars?

POST 20Original post

Still a nice car to have. At least you have the "bling-bling" rims and the badges, plus it's a car that you are used to. You can't miss what you never had. Enjoy your new baby!!

POST 21Original post

My 2cents worth on the X51: I turned in my 2003 996 C2 (in which I did 22 000 Km) for a 2004 996 C2 X51 (12 000 Km so far), so I have some back-to-back experience. The standard 996 was 0.2 seconds faster down the 1/4 mile (I have several very consistent time slips to back it up), although the X51 has a slightly higher trap speed. The X51 also uses noticably more fuel. Would I get another X51? NOOOOOO!!!!!!!!!!

POST 22Original post

Thanks for the attempt at objectivity. The statisticians are losing sleep over the coefficient of variation which exceeds that difference though

POST 23Original post

Thanks for the info. I had been looking at retrofitting the X51, but will likely pass. I'm not a big fan of aftermarket forced induction, so my C4S will stay stockish, well, except for camber plates and Motons.

POST 24Original post

Jaws, just curious. What caused the water damage?

POST 25 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

The damage was caused by the A/C condensor resevoir. It was damaged at the factory during assembly. My replacement car is being picked up on Thursday. Funny thing is that it has the only 2 options I did not get originally, PCM and rear wiper.

POST 26Original post

If you are thinking of a C4S, but a TT. If you are thinking C2, get the X51. The X51 power is all at the top of the band, but it is noticably afster than the stock car. Not as fast as a GT3 though.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.