Rennlist

Why doesn't the search function work?

Add to repair workspace

New repair projectOpen repair workspace

Original source

14 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis

THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHWhy doesn't the search function work?

Leading reported evidence

Replace search engine

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I think IB changed the search engine
Original post Read captured discussion
Why doesn't the search function work?

Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Replace search engine' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace search engine' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 14 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Use search

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster
I'm new here, so I didn't know how to use the search!
Original post Read captured discussion
Why doesn't the search function work?

Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Replace search engine

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I think IB changed the search engine
Original post Read captured discussion
Why doesn't the search function work?

Use search

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster
I'm new here, so I didn't know how to use the search!
Original post Read captured discussion
Why doesn't the search function work?

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Outcome without a verified action link
Never had to put the words in quotes before - but it worked!
Original post Read captured discussion
No unique explicit quoted action; no causal link assigned

Generation: 20261027T005001Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Every time I try a search, it brings me to results from today, or yesterday - and the results make no sense. Anyone else have this problem??

POST 2Original post

Try putting the search terms in quotation marks.

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Never had to put the words in quotes before - but it worked! Thanks!

POST 4Original post

No prob! I think IB changed the search engine

POST 5 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I'm new here, so I didn't know how to use the search!

POST 6Original post

Damn Newbies!!! Come on Newbie post the !@#$%^&* pics!!!! P.S. Just passin' through but I thought I would stop and a little.

POST 7Original post

Quotes source post: 6457353

Are you still here?? am I going to have to BAN you??

POST 8Original post

I KNEW he couldn't/wouldn't stay away!!!! And did I NOT absolutely predict he would be back here to challenge some newbie!

POST 9Original post

Yep, you called it, Thundertub. Just glad to have the old boy back!

POST 10Original post

He's like a crack addict...just can't do without the List or he starts to go into DTs.

POST 11Original post

He likes crack okay, but not the kind that you're referring to.

POST 12Original post

Quotes source post: 6457353

we love you Tim!

POST 13Original post

I have experienced the same problem. I thought it was operator error. Tim, nice to see you still around. This place would not be the same without you.

POST 14Original post

We had abig party at the office and gave speaches and presents to a guy retiring after 30 years. Next week he shows up as a partime per diem. Go figure

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.