24 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHOT: Dell or Tim: how do I put this back together?
Leading reported evidence
Use bondo
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
btw, anyone know if I can use Bondo to patch these holes?
Leading evidence: 'Use bondo' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use bondo' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
24 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T201111Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
OK, here goes.... I'll type this slowly so you can follow along..... insert tab A into slot A...... insert tab B into slot B..... etc, ect.
Got it????
BTW, I told you in the PM not to worry about trying to find that quarter that dropped out of your pocket and slid under the seat! BUt did you listen to me..... NOOOOOOooooooo!
When I disassembled my center console I found a whole boat load of quarters in there. Then both of the little plastic screws from the ashtray fell under the passenger seat -- I only got one out. I was just about ready to take the seat out when I realized that it probably slipped down into the body pan and so I would need to put the car on blocks and buy a whole new set of tools so I could remove the body pan to fetch the plastic screw...
Screw that! It's just a plastic screw. On the other hand, I did end up with one leftover interior screw. Hmm, I wonder where that was supposed to go.
