31 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHFS-2000.996 C2.Turbo Look...42Kmi..No Reserve!!!
Leading reported evidence
Inspect (true)
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
However, in the state of Minnesota it is allowable to have a car inspected (true) but the title will be branded PRIOR SALVAGE.
Leading evidence: 'Inspect (true)' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Inspect (true)' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
By the way Mac, have you ever run a Carfax on your car?
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
31 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T203514Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
The final dreadful day has finally came and i am finally forced to sell my Pcar...
i have it listed at NO RESERVE...and i will not end auction early,so the highest bidder takes her home.
here is an fleebay link and some final pics.....
i also listed in classified section.
SOLD
thanks
maci, rather wish that you keep that sweet ride. but we all understand. hope you get a favorable price for it and then quickly get back into a similar ride in the real near future.
btw - how did you get the turbo tail to fit your narrowbody? if aftermarket, where did you get it?
link fixed
turbo deck and wing were on the car by PO
link fixed...BTW i might get a honda from the sale of the Pcar....
Thanks everyone ................
little over a year (says in ad)
sad Maci... sorry you have to sell it
Ferd, Have you seen the video where that .gif on your signature was made? great spot of fuin those boys were having!
When I listed my car on eBay my two choices for "type of title" were clear or salvage. It's pretty clear when you list the car so that's the reason I ask. Selecting "clear" and then saying it has salvage history is not being truthful.
The title is clear ,not salvage.... salvage history means there was an accident in the past
The title is clear ,not salvage....salvage history means there was an accident in the past
The title is clear ,not salvage....salvage history means there was an accident in the past
The title is clear ,not salvage....salvage history means there was an accident in the past
thanks everyone....
Having a wreck does NOT mean salvage history. Was the car totaled out by the insurance company? You will need to elaborate or you are going to severely impact your sale. The last thing you want is for a potential buyer to have doubts about the car.
How in the world did you get a salvage title to magically become no salvage anymore? Once the car is a salvage it ALWAYS is a salvage and must be disclosed as such.
There are some "loopholes" to get a "clear" title but that is a whole 'nother matter you don't want to be part of.
Sir in the state of Minnesota a salvage title can be cleared after state inspection.....however that ended sometime last year and now salvage vehicles must have a
PRIOR SALVAGE
stamp on the title.
different states have different laws and regulations......please read yours
No need to read mine as I am not trying to clear a salvage title. However, in the state of Minnesota it is allowable to have a car inspected (true) but the title will be branded PRIOR SALVAGE. For you benefit I would be CLEAR on that point. "SALVAGE HISTORY" is very ambiguous. The more info you can provide and why the better you chances are for top dollar as ANY car with the word salvage anywhere near it will shy away would be top dollar buyer. Do yourself a favor and read the Minnesota law and report that in your ad so your buyer feels more at ease.
Mac, we are only trying to help you get the best dollar for your car by explaining to you how clear you need to be. That's all. No need to be so offended.
not offended....i have disclosed that the vehicle had salvage history and now has a clear one......
i am not sure what more should i put besides and i qoute from my ad "The vehicle has a clear title with a salvage history(i believe the car had a front damage during which the conversion was made)." ?
maybe u can help me.....
Glad to help. I would suggest stating in your ad that while the car had a state issued salvage title after an accident, by law, it was allowed to be inspected to have the title re-issued as a clear title. This will give you the support you need to explain away a salvage title and show that the car has passed a STATE inspection approving it to have the clear title issued. This will cover you bases especially if somebody pulls a carfax and gets spooked. I have no doubt you will get top dollar if you explain this clearly. You are lucky to have a state that allows for an inspection process to help cars have the stigma of salvage removed if they have shown to be "as good" as a clear titled car.
Good luck with the sale!
Keep us posted.
I am with Dell... no offense meant, I just want to help point out anything that might be a concern to buyers and stop you from getting the highest possible sale price in an already "buyers market"
i support you as well... and wish you well on the sale!!
BTW - WOOO dude your auction is smoking!!! Lots of action and lots of time left... I am really encouraged by these bids!!
WTG !!
one person retracted bid after several messages and phone calls...then stated he couldnt reach me ... (i contacted ebay and they told me they couldnt delete that statement....
) but will prosecute the bidder...
i have a HTC diamond and listen to 1club.fm and di.fm thru the phone wirelesly via bluetooth cd player........
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
