fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Radar detectors: what do you like, and why?

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
16 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHRadar detectors: what do you like, and why?

Leading reported evidence

Use combination of waze and the radar detector

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

So for long drives I use a combination of Waze and the radar detector.

Radar detectors: what do you like, and why?
Frequently discussed work

Run newer narrow beam radar

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

However, if the officer is parked perpendicular to traffic and running newer narrow beam radar, then it's highly probable that your detector will NOT sound off until it's right up on the source.

Radar detectors: what do you like, and why?
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Use combination of waze and the radar detector' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run newer narrow beam radar' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 16 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 4 other evidence results

Use waze years ago

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster

I used Waze years ago but got out of the habit.

Radar detectors: what do you like, and why?

Run newer narrow beam radar

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

However, if the officer is parked perpendicular to traffic and running newer narrow beam radar, then it's highly probable that your detector will NOT sound off until it's right up on the source.

Radar detectors: what do you like, and why?

Run waze and r8 companion app over bluetooth

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Uniden r8 , run Waze and r8 companion app over Bluetooth.

Radar detectors: what do you like, and why?

Run waze is important

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

This is why running WAZE is important for those traveling on long trips in areas that you're unfamiliar with.

Radar detectors: what do you like, and why?
Frequently discussed actions (10)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Run newer narrow beam radar

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

However, if the officer is parked perpendicular to traffic and running newer narrow beam radar, then it's highly probable that your detector will NOT sound off until it's right up on the source.

Radar detectors: what do you like, and why?

Run waze and r8 companion app over bluetooth

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Uniden r8 , run Waze and r8 companion app over Bluetooth.

Radar detectors: what do you like, and why?

Run waze is important

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

This is why running WAZE is important for those traveling on long trips in areas that you're unfamiliar with.

Radar detectors: what do you like, and why?

Use because even

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

It�s important to know what your city�s agencies use because even with a good detector, if they�re using Laser or Lidar, it�s not going to help.

Radar detectors: what do you like, and why?

Use combination of waze and the radar detector

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

So for long drives I use a combination of Waze and the radar detector.

Radar detectors: what do you like, and why?

Use exact same tones

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Funny thing is it uses the exact same tones that my cheap detector did 30 years ago.

Radar detectors: what do you like, and why?

Use laser

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I'm not talking about LIDAR, which as most know uses laser to calculate a person's speed almost instantaneous, but requires the officer to be stationary unlike traditional RADAR that allows the officer to calculate multiple speed points while driving.

Radar detectors: what do you like, and why?

Use laser or lidar

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

It�s important to know what your city�s agencies use because even with a good detector, if they�re using Laser or Lidar, it�s not going to help.

Radar detectors: what do you like, and why?

Use more concentrated narrow beam

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Unlike the old stuff that drifted for miles, the newer technology uses a more concentrated narrow beam.

Radar detectors: what do you like, and why?

Use same tech so they're not exactly false

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

They use the same tech so they're not exactly false.

Radar detectors: what do you like, and why?
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

16 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T152433Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Now that my home state is increasingly using speed cameras and some (apparently hyper-sensitive) stop light cameras, my wife is actually thinking we need radar detectors. I've heard good things about Valentine One detectors, but I'm wondering what else is out there and can provide reliable notifications not only for speed radar/laser, etc. but also for cameras, and that have good reputations as not sending too many "false positive" signals. What do you use, why did you choose that, and if you were in the market, what would you buy? FWIW, I'm also looking into dash cams but I'm not ready to pull that trigger.

POST 2Original post

There might be something useful in this thread: https://rennlist.com/forums/996-foru...-detector.html

POST 3Original post

I have a Uniden R7, it does detect a lot and some far off stuff. However last year on a trip back from Pinedale to Casper, middle of nowhere, was going 80 in 65. all of a sudden it lit up. No warning no nothing until he had me... so since then ive come to learn not to put too much faith into them. Maybe there are better units out there, but I think cops have learned how to use them more effectively.

POST 4Original post

Quotes source post: 19500750

It�s important to know what your city�s agencies use because even with a good detector, if they�re using Laser or Lidar, it�s not going to help.

POST 5Original post

Quotes source post: 19501060

Yea, COPS have better training and better radar technology. What you probably encountered was more modern narrow beam radar. Unlike the old stuff that drifted for miles, the newer technology uses a more concentrated narrow beam. I'm not talking about LIDAR, which as most know uses laser to calculate a person's speed almost instantaneous, but requires the officer to be stationary unlike traditional RADAR that allows the officer to calculate multiple speed points while driving. Pro and cons to both. Best thing to do is to use the detection technology as one counter measurement tool not the sole counter measurement tool. WAZE is another tool for example.

POST 7Original post

I have the Uniden R3, I've had it a couple of years and like it. It's warned me of hidden police vehicles in the distance many times, however you also get quite a few false alarms. I'm sure the newer models are better at both detection and avoiding false triggers. Overall I like that it reminds me to slow down for potential cops and even if it was a false alarm, well at least I'm driving safer more often 😁

POST 8Original post

I’m also up in Evergreen! I’ve been a fan of Escort products for years and I have owned several of their products. I highly recommend them. The major highways around the Denver area use Traffic Sensing Radar or TSR and it can cause multiple, annoying false alarms. Escort has a TSR filter setting that works very well to eliminate these false alarms.

POST 9Original post

I live in SoCal and got the Valentine One about a year and a half ago. I usually leave it out when tooling around town and put it in for the long trips like driving to Vegas. I hadn't had a radar detector since around 1990 and I don't get a lot of false positives with it like I did back then. Funny thing is it uses the exact same tones that my cheap detector did 30 years ago. It's supposed to detect laser but by the time it's detected they have your speed. I don't think I've ever gotten a legit laser warning with it yet. What I do get are warnings from the signs that show your speed in neighborhoods and construction zones. I'd say 90% of the time it goes off it's one of those. They use the same tech so they're not exactly false. The good thing is that you can mute the warning (my 1980s detector didn't do that). It has alerted me to a few cops but I actually think Waze does a better job of that. So for long drives I use a combination of Waze and the radar detector.

POST 10Original post

Quotes source post: 19502173

agree- R3 is best bang for the buck. Low profile too.

POST 11Original post

Uniden r8 , run Waze and r8 companion app over Bluetooth. The app takes map, Waze, user plus other police and driver data in to it and maps and correlates to your detector and gps location. Very effective. For lidar protection you are looking at a few grand to do it properly. Best bet is the tools above and keen awareness. - scrh1

POST 12Original post

Quotes source post: 19501060

Same thing happened to me twice with an Escort 360 max. I've done a lot of research and called Escort. I'm pretty convinced that radar detectors are now literally worse than worthless. They give you a false sense of security, but they cannot detect radar or laser fast enough. Sure, if there is thick traffic and they fire at cars in front of you first, your detector may save you. But how do you drive fast in thick traffic? I certainly do not. When the roads are clear (as they typically are around here) I drive fast. That's when I need a trustworthy detector, but they don't work in those conditions anymore.

POST 13Original post

Quotes source posts: 19503798, 19501060

Most of the radar tests you see on YouTube (i.e. Vortex radar channel) have the radar guns pointed directly at on-coming traffic. However, if the officer is parked perpendicular to traffic and running newer narrow beam radar, then it's highly probable that your detector will NOT sound off until it's right up on the source. This is why running WAZE is important for those traveling on long trips in areas that you're unfamiliar with. For me, I use it as a tool for situation awareness. The best part of the Escort Radar detectors is connecting to the Drive Smarter network to alert you when you're over the speed limit or approaching a threat (e.g. speed cameras).

POST 14Original post

I haven't used a radar detector in over 10 years; moved exclusively to Waze. /X3

POST 15Original post

Quotes source post: 19503915

thank you very much for the tip, I live where there is a LOT of wide open space but I will defiantly try the Waze app.

POST 16 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Good discussion here. I “think” I have good situational awareness as I haven’t (knocks on wood) had so much as a warning in over a decade and I confess that it isn’t for a lack of trying. Many years ago I read an article about trying to be invisible. It included helpful tips like not driving like a d1ck, not being the fastest car on the road, having a well maintained vehicle, driving something inconspicuous… I’m generally good about all those (admittedly not 100% of the time) with the exception of the conspicuous car. I used Waze years ago but got out of the habit. Maybe that’s the answer. I totally get the argument that having a detector can lead to complacency and a false sense of security so perhaps I just remain vigilant. Thanks for the conversation. In real life I’d buy us a round. 🍻

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.