fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

A plea for photos from Ohio

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
5 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHA plea for photos from Ohio

Leading reported evidence

Use of this sign

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

There are possible jurisdictional issues with use of this sign which appears to be in non-conformance with the Manual On Uniform Traffic Control Devices.

Original post Read captured discussion
A plea for photos from Ohio
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Use of this sign' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use of this sign' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 5 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Use of this sign

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster

There are possible jurisdictional issues with use of this sign which appears to be in non-conformance with the Manual On Uniform Traffic Control Devices.

Original post Read captured discussion
A plea for photos from Ohio
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

5 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261027T000231Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

If anyone in Ohio happens to have a digital camera handy as they come upon on of the signs on the Interstates that designate the maximum speed on those roads, I would be most grateful for a photo of one of those signs. I confess I had full memory card when I last passed one of them and probably should have stopped to buy another card so I could photograph a sign. No rush, but sometime in the next few weeks would be nice. What am I doing collecting photos of speed control signs?? Well, you see, those signs may be in violation of federal law. Once in awhile I find myself and some of my friends passing through Ohio. Something doesn't fit and it is irritating. Thanks to anyone who can furnish a photo of one.

POST 2 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I have been furnished a photo of a sign on the 911 forum. Thanks.

POST 3Original post

Care to post it so when can see what you are referring to?

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Here is the deviant sign. There are possible jurisdictional issues with use of this sign which appears to be in non-conformance with the Manual On Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Signs on federally funded highways must conform to the MUTCD.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.