fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

FS: Continental Contact Sport 2's

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
9 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHFS: Continental Contact Sport 2's

Leading reported evidence

Run then

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Don't even think of running then.

FS: Continental Contact Sport 2's
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Run then' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run then' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 9 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Run then

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

Don't even think of running then.

FS: Continental Contact Sport 2's
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T124918Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

205/50/17 4k miles on them, $115.00 each or $220.00 for both. 255/40/17 15 miles on them, $75.00 each or $140.00 for both. I'm located in Central NJ.

POST 2Original post

You should post the DOT codes from the sidewall that tells the manufactured date.

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Will do. Thx for the advice.

POST 5Original post

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tirete....jsp?techid=11

POST 6 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Bump: Mfg date for the tires are: Front: Week 27 1995, purchased from Princeton Porsche 2009 Rears: Week 27 1996, purchased from Princeton Porsche 2008

POST 7Original post

Don't even think of running then. 6 years is the max for dependability. From what you are saying, 2001 was the year they went out of date. Unless you feel lucky....dirty harry style. Do you feel lucky? Well do you feel lucky, and you know what that turns into.

POST 8 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Alright. 1 more Bump. Correction on tire mfg date; Fronts 1108 Rears 1005 I was looking at the wrong code sequence. Thought it was odd that the tires were purchased a couple of years making it a stretch to be over 10 years old.

POST 9 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Bump with new price. Make an offer.... Loads of life in these tires. Be ready for the warm weather driving.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.