9 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHBeware of 'jordimascaro' on Evilbay...
Leading reported evidence
Use "qualified bidders only" system
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Problem is you can use the "qualified bidders only" system, but it has been used WAY too much in cases of fraud so it is a big red flag these days.
Leading evidence: 'Use "qualified bidders only" system' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use "qualified bidders only" system' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I had a buyer with 0 feedback tell me he never bid on my item, never looked at it, and never had the car to use the item with.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T192637Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Firstly, I will take some blame because I forgot to put in my ad about someone with '0' feedback contacting me first. So my Ebay ad for my 996 ended 7 days ago with 'jordimascaro' from Spain winning, but then of course he never responds to anything. I have to wait a week to file a claim so I don't have to pay Ebay any fees, and now Ebay says I have to wait another 8 days for the dispute to be complete and then I can relist it. Arrrggghh. I'm moving soon and didn't want to deal with this hassle from some idiot Ebayer. Sorry, rant over. I hate Evilbay.
Ebay doesn't really care if their users get screwed as long as they get their fees.
I don't accept bids from anyone with recent negative feedback, 0 feedback, or anyone from outside the continental US. If I can't find a buyer that meets those criteria I am asking too much for whatever I'm selling.
I put it into my text. IMO they don't give you enough ways to block unwanted bidders. If I had my way I would not accept bids from anyone whose account was less than six months old and had less than 5 transactions, not including those $1.50 one's. I only want tried and true ebay people bidding on my stuff. If someone knows how to do that, chime in please!
Unfortunately you cannot block them. Problem is you can use the "qualified bidders only" system, but it has been used WAY too much in cases of fraud so it is a big red flag these days.
I am with you, the only problems I have ever had with selling on ebay is with new buyers, buyers with 0 feedback, or buyers with recent negative feedback. I usually write something to that effect in my auction text, and inevitably I will get some jerk-off who says I cannot limit my buyers that way, but I just cancel their bids and move on. One guy got REALLY upset, but you have to ignore those people.
I had a buyer with 0 feedback tell me he never bid on my item, never looked at it, and never had the car to use the item with. I reminded him that there are at least 3 clicks to place a bid and that his story was B.S.
On my ads, I explicitly state.
"Shipping available on to the lower 48 States within the United States. NO shipping to Canada or International Shipping."
Funny thing is I still occasionally get International bids.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
