19 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH996 mk1 bumper cover fit.
Leading reported evidence
Adjust other brackets
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I tried adjusting the other brackets but it make little change over all.
Leading evidence: 'Adjust other brackets' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Adjust other brackets' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I had the same issue initially and was able to resolve it by changing the order of installation.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I think you need to rode test her...I mean it first
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
19 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T161109Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I have seen this on many cars and mine is doing it too and it is drving me insane.
The front bumper cover. If you look close it appears the cover is sagging in the front..
PIX ON THE WAY HAD TO MAKE AND EDIT TO POINT IT OUT
here look at this while I edit
Is there a big gap between the bottom of the headlights and bumper? If so I had the same issue. If you take the bumper off, you will see that the bumper will slide into a sleeve. I forgot how I did mine but you can move that sleeve up making it a tighter fit. You will have to move other things to get to it though. Its easier than it looks..... nice hour or so project.
I had the same issue initially and was able to resolve it by changing the order of installation. If you read the installation instructions closely you'll see that they specify attaching all of the vertical screws/attachment points before the horizontal (damn my brain, it might be the opposite). It doesn't seem like a big deal, but it allowed me to bring everything into alignment. Unfortunately I don't have the document at work or I'd post it.
-Shawn
I dunno what I am going to do with it. But it bother the heck out of me. It just makes the car look hit at some point.
if I fix it. I will post how.
Now that first pix.......... we need a plan to get that bumper cover off... I may need some help fom Al Cohole?
i Dont think its fixable with out a new cover. It seems like its alike a 70 year old set of *****. Things are just sagging. There is a point where the cover jams up into the fender to pull it tight at the front corner where the sag is. The mounting point is sagging on the cover. Over all I chalk it up to a poor design for mounting. I tried adjusting the other brackets but it make little change over all.
I may try some of the beading the 928 has between its bumper over and fenders. I guess I will put her back together. But man the sloppy fit DRIVES ME NUTS
that was a complete waste of 2 hours
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
