29 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHDealer refusing to allow offsite PPI?
Reported or suspected cause
have had front-end damage repaired
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause
A colleague once bought a Miata that turned out to have had front-end damage repaired before its "new car sale." Someone must have wrecked it, or it fell off the truck with less than 42 miles.
Leading evidence: 'have had front-end damage repaired' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'have had front-end damage repaired' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Check list' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
necessarily one of finding hidden damage or the like
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
Well, I don't think that for the buyer the issue is necessarily one of finding hidden damage or the like.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
What is to keep a dealership honest about signing off on the check list for certification?
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Also, you could ask if they would give the name and number of the previous owner to check on accident history.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Although you may be able to return the car for work under warranty, being doubly satisfied by having a "clean" PPI report along with certification gives you maximum peace of mind, which you may feel you need when spending this much money on a car.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I spoke with the dealer and according to my sales person, they offered to let the independent come onsite (and use a lift) to inspect the car and that Perf Auto agreed.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I spoke with the dealer and according to my sales person, they offered to let the independent come onsite (and use a lift) to inspect the car and that Perf Auto agreed.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
have had front-end damage repaired
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause
A colleague once bought a Miata that turned out to have had front-end damage repaired before its "new car sale." Someone must have wrecked it, or it fell off the truck with less than 42 miles.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
29 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T083035Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
This is a strange situation. I wanted to see what the Rennlist thought of it.
Im in NYC and I found a car that meets my requirements at Brandywine. Now I know Brandywine has a great rep and this car is certified, so I figured smooth sailing all the way.
The thing is, since I'm remote, I figured I would have an independent PPI done before I take a day off and a long *** ride down to PA.
For the PPI, I selected Performance Automotive. I figured this would be a no-brainer since both of these places seem to be very well respected in the Porsche community.
Everything was going ok when all of a sudden the Brandywine sales manager decided that they "will not allow the car off premises" and that Performance Automotive would have to go to the dealership to see the car. I got the feeling that the Perf Auto guys were a little insulted by this and told me they wouldnt be able to do the PPI.
Now Im stuck and Im not sure what to do. I have a good faith deposit on the car, so its not as if I'm a total "out of the blue" caller. Brandywine has such a good rep (and the car is certified), that I dont want to just forget the whole thing since the car really is nearly exactly what I was looking for.
Any opinions on this situation? Is this policy Brandywine has typical?
It's certified and Brandywine has a good rep. Maybe they have had some "personal" dealing with Performance, ex-employees, etc and don't like to deal with them.
If you think it is a good car, and remember it has to meet certain criteria to be certified, buy it. And then have it checked out. Anything found would be covered under the warranty.
I'd most definetely pass no matter what Brandywine's rep if they can't give you a legitimate reason why they are scared to have someone not making money on the car look at it.
I don't think Brandywine is being totally unreasonable, given the liabilities of allowing the car off premises, not that they couldn't do it, plus possibly concern over someone else messing with the car. Since its certified, it doesn't seem to be a big issue.
You are covered if your state has a 3 day recision period on new and used auto purchases from dealers. I am not sure about NJ as far as this law.
Cabman
I have bought certified porsches sight unseen from reputable dealers.....I never asked for an outside PPI nor have I ever encountered a problem post purchase.......It is a pain for the dealer in terms of time and third party liability......your dealer is in an agent capacity for PCNA or the factory in fact by signing off on certification....a PPI is not the end all on a newer Porsche
Well, I don't think that for the buyer the issue is necessarily one of finding hidden damage or the like. I would think that the PPI would be able to note such things as small dings and general condition of the car. One of the cars that I looked at was a St. Louis dealer certified 996 Cab, and while it was in very good/excellent condition, there were some touch-ups and some wear that would be noted by an impartial party. Knowing such things up front may make a difference.
Geert
I went with Brandywine when I got my 01 tt -- I have nothing but good things to say about them. I pass quite a few Porsche dealers on the way out to them.
For the car to be certified, it must pass a long list from Porsche that they must then sign off on. They will show you this and give you a copy. I think this may change your mind about the car.
If the car still has its 4/50 warranty in place - it is no different than buying a new car -- since everything is covered. I do not see the need for a second inspection.
When I was looking I noticed that all the used cars they had were certified and the cars they had were all nice. Other dealers may have had more cars but they were not as nice.
Many dealers do not want to go to the trouble or time -- of the process. They just want to sell cars.
Porsche does not allow any dealer to certify a car without a thorough inspection, and if the car has had body damage it can't be certified.
I think the "certification" far exceeds and supercedes the value of a PDI. You get a warranty to boot!
I wouldn't even worry about it, enjoy a nice bottle of wine with the money you save on the PDI.
Ben as you know new Porsches are frequently painted, repaired etc from damage in transit from the factory at the ports of entry.....then shipped to dealer......I got one once.......
Having said that, if you don't have confidence in the dealer's employes, then one should get off their butt and go look at the damn car in person.....hell even take a trained "eye" with you
there can be minor flaws , new or used.....
Totally disagree. You should have the right to have the car inspected by a local 3rd party. It is very resonable. Off premises? What, do they make you take a test drive around the parking lot? What a crock!
There are plenty of P-cars out there...
I would take a pass. Certified or not.
How many times have I read on this board "always get a PPI." I know of an Audi dealership that certified an A6 even though it was a recovered stolen and wrecked car. I felt so sorry for the guy after a short period of ownership he started having problems with it. Then he found out the true nature of the car. I don't think it is to much to ask for a PPI by a local 3rd party.
If an Audi dealership did that then there was fraud involved..and the appropriate remedies.
The "certified" car is as worry free as it gets. Spend some time to understand what Porsche requires of a dealership to certify a car versus a "cursory" PDI and you'll see it's a no brainer. Some people posting here obviously don't!
Ask each party to give you the guidelines for PDI and the "certified" program... yes they have them.
Certified or not, a warranty is only as good as the people behind it. Who does these certification inspections? Is it the dealer? I'd rather have a car without problems than one with problems and have to beat the dealer over the head to fix it.
When I was looking for a 996 I test drove one at Carlsen Porsche in Redwood City, CA and even before I had a chance to bring the subject up the salesman told me I could have a PPI done anywhere I wanted to. I would never buy a used car without a PPI even if it had a warranty. Afterall, we are talking about the used car business!
You have misunderstood. Nobody suggests you get a PPI instead of a certified warranty. The suggestion is that you get a PPI AS WELL AS a certified warranty. I would think that if the bill of health s so clean, than getting a PPI would be no big deal, right? Seems like a no brainer to me (!)
What a dealership committing fraud? Nope that has never happened before.
There are good dealerships and there are bad bed dealerships. Both have one goal in mind to make as much money as they can. Fair enough. Dealerships know that more people will be interested in a certified versus a non-certified car. And they can ask for a premium for that used car. What is to keep a dealership honest about signing off on the check list for certification? If the car is as good as they say it is, why should the dealership have a problem with a 3rd party check. As a consumer shouldn't you project yourself as best as you can? Again I ask, how many times on here have you read "always get a PPI."
I guess, I would want to know why the dealership has a problem with it? To me it raise a red flag. Cause once you buy it its yours for good or bad. The PPI lets you know what your dealing with.
Just my .02 worth:
(1) There is an inevitable conflict of interest (by definition) where the people selling you the car are also the people certifying it (btw, I'm not doubting the good faith of the certification process or those who carry out the certification).
(2) A PPI by an independent person (as long as he is competent) removes (as best you can) the potential for the buyer to suffer, at the end of the day. Although you may be able to return the car for work under warranty, being doubly satisfied by having a "clean" PPI report along with certification gives you maximum peace of mind, which you may feel you need when spending this much money on a car.
(3) I am fairly certain that there are numerous examples on any of the various forums (even on this thread - see above) of people in both the US and the UK having had PPI's done on certified cars and the PPI picking up things that need doing (dings, etc) that the man on the street (i.e. someone completely useless like me) I would not pick up. This alone (to my mind, and I appreciate others may think differently) makes a PPI worthwhile.
(4) I'm a little surprised that your PPI guys weren't happy about having to go over to the dealer to look at the car - quite common in the UK, and the PPI guy (if suitably insured of course) can take the car out (and out of the parking lot!).
(5) (Again just a personal view), anyone prepared to certify a car ought to be prepared to have a PPI done. By definition (on their account of things), the PPI will find nothing that needs doing
.
Regards
Deeps
As Colm stated, read the language of the Certification Agreement....The dealer is acting in a agent capacity for PCNA and the Factory......this is a worldwide document....
Dealers have good reasons for not sending cars out unless they have a bonafide contract to sell....
My experience over 30 years with Porsche dealers all over the country has been great....Most have gone to any length to to the right thing...No dealer wants to risk reputation, franchise rights and allocation restrictions...
Do a PPI onsite, if you are uncomfortable......
I am sure people have horror tales to share, but I suspect they are the exception, not the rule......
Last comment, if folks don't like a dealer's policy go to another one.....We are in America afterall
Thanks everyone for the great replies and advice. I spoke with the dealer and according to my sales person, they offered to let the independent come onsite (and use a lift) to inspect the car and that Perf Auto agreed. Very strange considering that according to Perf Auto, they are not interested in doing that.
The dealer is going to try to work it out with them. Someone must have rubbed someone the wrong way. In any event, I'm going to head down and see the car in person next week. Hopefully, I can work out a professional PPI prior to that...
If any PA guys happen to find yourselves at Brandywine over the weekend, and wouldnt mind taking a quick look see at the 99 silver, aerokit, tip I'd be most appreciative!
The paranoid don't need to find something to worry about.
Let me tell you a little story about certified cars and why you can take a great deal of comfort in "certified" cars
My wife got in an accident with our 04 Cayenne TT (3000 miles) and I got an estimate from the dealer recommended body shop..estimate $25K.
OK, so I figured I'll do a deal and get a new one (taking a small hit for the convenience)and let the Dealer take care of getting the car repaired.
No way, the dealer (or any others I talked were not interested) because the car could not be certified.
You should consider that I'm a very good customer, who buys 2-3 cars per year, and they wouldn't do it for me. Why? because they didn't want the liability of selling a potentially troublesome car to a customer.
This speaks pretty well for the dealer(s) (California), and their sensitivity towards their obligations They have rigorous standards, be it for a known or unknown customer.
Moral of the story: buy your used Porsche from a dealer, and get it certified...while ther is always risk of the unknown you will have minimized it...and a PPI (not PDI) will not tell you anything more than the Dealers inspection.
Price is another matter.
"Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean that they are not out to get me!" - Woody Allen
Colm, you continue to miss the mark. The fact that you have established a good relationship with a reputable dealer is great. Has nothing to do with this situation. This person has had NO DEALINGS with this dealer. He has no experience with this dealer and the history of the car is unknown to him. Suggesting that because your dealer is reputable, all dealers must be reputable is disengenuous. Here's another story - I was looking at a pre-owned car at a dealership in Northern Jersey. He would sell it to me certified for $2K more than uncertified. When I asked him if it had original paint he said he didn't know and would have to check. This was AFTER he had offered to certify it. Here as anywhere," Buyer Beware" applies.
I guess we are all now belaboring the point somewhat. Apparently there are those that consider the certification "gold", almost a guaranteed new car. I fall in the other category, i.e. those that feel a used car is always to a certain degree an unknown quantity. Certainly, new cars can also have had damage. A colleague once bought a Miata that turned out to have had front-end damage repaired before its "new car sale." Someone must have wrecked it, or it fell off the truck with less than 42 miles. After endless trips back to the dealer to try and have the front properly aligned, an independent shop discovered the damage. After months of hassle and the intervention of a lawyer, the dealership agreed to a deal which wasn't perfect but my colleague had been beaten down. Thus, I agree that even with a new car one can have trouble. Nonetheless, the standard for a new car is vastly different than that for a used one. If you discover that your car has had some paint work done on, say, the rear bumper the dealership will mostly like send you away with a "well, it's a pre-owned vehicle and we didn't know." Ask me how I know...
Geert
The dealership I had this happen with was a Volvo dealership. We bought a certified family wagon a couple of years ago. Low miles, looked mint. One day I noticed some flaking on a spot on the side of the rear bumper. Obviously a repainted bumper. When quizzed, the dealer said, "Well, since it was pre-owned we cannot know all of its history. The first owner may have had the bumper repainted." So there.
Of course, we are talking about cosmetics, and perhaps the Porsche dealer is more stringent. I did read somewhere that Volvo and Jaguar's certified programs were the best in the industry coverage-wise. As for pursuing the issue to have the bumper repainted properly; ever seen a family station wagon inside?
Kinda makes the outside irrelevant.
That is what I have the Porsche for: serene cleanliness, profound perfection. No food, no drink (early 996 years have no cupholder
!). Usually I make the kids take their shoes off when getting in.
Geert
Update:
Went down to Brandywine, checked out the car myself, bought it and love it. Everything was as represented by them and the experience was excellent (worked with Tom).
As a little bonus (for me at least) the car had B&B headers and exhaust which was a nice plus. Brandywine was great in providing the service records, certification inspection sheet and records of everything they performed to bring the car up to certification level.
Not sure what had happened with the PPI situation (probably will never know), but the car looked/sounded/felt right to me and I've got the warranty, so I went for it.
First Brandywine has great rep. I also know people who "go out there" and pass other dealers along the way. What I suggest is either pay Brandywine for the Inspection and get the R.O and notes. THereby binding there service department in an accurate assessment that either agrees with their sales or disagrees with.
OR buy it contigent on the PPI elsewhere, drive down, buy it and have it checked. Pass no problem.
BTW is there a specific issue that you are concerned about? Aside from the usual. Because if is RMS or Bodywork, likely there are alternative ways to find this out ( Carfax, dealer records etc). Also, you could ask if they would give the name and number of the previous owner to check on accident history.
Overall if you like the car and the price, go with it.
ScottS
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.