Rennlist

Part number question: 996........

Add to repair workspace

New repair projectOpen repair workspace

Original source

3 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis

THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHPart number question: 996........

Leading reported evidence

Check twice and i know

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster
The part number was double checked twice and I know that it doesn't come up in PET but here's the best I could do to help show what I'm talking about.
Original post Read captured discussion
Part number question: 996........

Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Check twice and i know' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check twice and i know' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 3 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Check twice and i know

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster
The part number was double checked twice and I know that it doesn't come up in PET but here's the best I could do to help show what I'm talking about.
Original post Read captured discussion
Part number question: 996........

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

3 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T120458Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Hi again, Trying to figure out why a part number that I took off my pedal assembly doesn't come up on the Porsche system. The part number is located on the piece that I need but I can seem to get it. Any one experiences this problem? Part number: 996-423-680-06 -Eli

POST 2Original post

Could you be misreading the number? Can you check again? Which part is it?

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

The part number was double checked twice and I know that it doesn't come up in PET but here's the best I could do to help show what I'm talking about. I know you'll see it if you take a flashlight to your pedal cluster. This piece is around the clutch pedal and is not the same color as the rest of metal brackets up there. It appears to be a gold tone... THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR ANY HELP....

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.