29 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH997 air box swap
Leading reported evidence
Use 997 snorkel you have
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
If you use the 997 snorkel you have to rotate the air pump by ten degrees .
Leading evidence: 'Use 997 snorkel you have' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use 997 snorkel you have' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Some of use have to keep the minimum jerk quota alive on RL.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I have the debate in my head over keeping it standard vs using the newer looking awesome part!
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
29 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T112012Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I put a 997 3.6 air box in my 2004 c2 .
I decided to reuse the 996 snorkel because it clears the air pump and mated well with the lid aperture , I have the 997 snorkel . I may or may not try it .
Unbolt the old one , take it out . Bolt the new one it , the mounts are identical. You reuse the same maf sensor . The 997 intake hose fits right on .
If you use the 997 snorkel you have to rotate the air pump by ten degrees .
If you use the 996 snorkel you don't , the two mount into the airbix body identically . , I liked the way the 996 snorkle fit into the deck lid so I reused it .
But I might get a ducktail down the line and I think the 997 snorkle might work better with one of those fibreglass tails.
That's bad ***! I've always liked the way the 997 air box looked in comparison to ours. Ours is just so "business." The 997 is atleast business with a little style. Great job!
Very Nice mod!! Now try putting the 997 frunk in? That would be another great project.
I bought the 987 boxster floor mats because they were cheaper and it was a perfect fit. Dimensionally these two generations are pretty much the same.
Vacuum actuated, as the revs went up the valve closed to give more noise and POWER!
Of course im joking about the power...
You can mod a 3.8 997 to permanently close the flap regardless of rpm too.
I have the debate in my head over keeping it standard vs using the newer looking awesome part!
Standard won, but seeing this makes me reconsider as I could always just swap it back
