15 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHInteresting V1 FYI Factoid: false signals
Leading reported evidence
Recommend keeping your cell phone at least 4 ft away
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Valentine 1 did recommend keeping your Cell Phone at least 4 ft away from your detector and/or moving from the "little" L setting (hypersensitive esp.
Leading evidence: 'Recommend keeping your cell phone at least 4 ft away' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Recommend keeping your cell phone at least 4 ft away' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Valentine 1 did recommend keeping your Cell Phone at least 4 ft away from your detector and/or moving from the "little" L setting (hypersensitive esp.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Sure enough about 3-4 seconds later there was a Benbrook police officer on the side of the road using instant on.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Nicholas, your false warnings/bogies from construction sites, speed monitoring systems, gas stations are related to their use of an X-band-like radar signal to detect either speed, motion of incoming/outgoing customers on automatic doors, or on construction vechiles that use public highways.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Nicholas, your false warnings/bogies from construction sites, speed monitoring systems, gas stations are related to their use of an X-band-like radar signal to detect either speed, motion of incoming/outgoing customers on automatic doors, or on construction vechiles that use public highways.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Construction zones also use X-Band warning devices on the digital signs and construction equipment but I've never received more than 1-2 readings in these areas before and they usually are short lived.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
15 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
FYI to all V1 owners. I've had mine for over 5 yrs and owned no other for the past 10 yrs. Never been disappointed with the service and reliability of the V1. Can't live without the "Arrows" and range.
Recently my V1 began to detected multiple bogies (5-9) in the X-band in
areas where I have never detected any radar activity. Signal strength was
high and lasted for 15-30 miles. Initially thought that living in Illinois and driving through farm country that many of the farm tractors, trailers, chemical tanks, which have radar (X-Band) warning signals on them had something to do with setting off the detector, although 5-9 tractors,etc, in one place or close by would be unusual and suspect. Construction zones also use X-Band warning devices on the digital signs and construction equipment but I've never received more than 1-2 readings in these areas before and they usually are short lived. This situation obviously warranted further investigation.
Sent the V1 to Valentine........ great service department........never a fee for
shipping or repair from my experiece. After multiple tests of the integrity
of the detector nothing was found to be awry. We ruled out any of the above
but upon further investigation the V1 Tech informed me that many of the new
Cell Phones (labeled with CMDA ...unsure of actual order of letters) emitted a
signal when "searching for service" that is detected by the V1 as an X-Band bogie as described above. Sprint and Verizon were identified as the most
prone to produce such an anomaly.
Prior to onset of my problem I had purchased a new Sprint "Blade". When driving in areas where service is variable turning the phone off or moving it at least 4 ft. from the detector solved the problem.
Onward and Upward Fellow Rennlisters,
No so fast grasshopper, as to the status of X-Band radar,those of us living in less populated and affluent areas still are subject to be vicitimized by my of the local authorities that either cannot afford to up-grade their Radar Guns or prefer not too because of those that think it is extinct, hence, it has
become a very useful and productive speed control/detection device.
Oh man, I have been wondering about that. I was recently driving though some canyons and there was noooobody around, and with all the curves, nothing could be reflecting around that much. So, at some similar intervals of time, I would get an x-band blip. I was scratchin' my head on those. Makes sense it may have been my phone searching for a signal, it is CDMA. Good post, thanks for the info.
I have to check this out. I called Valentine and have been meaning to send my unit back for the same reason. It just started about two weeks ago. My cell has not changed but maybe in adjacent cars? Very weird. The only consistent falses i have gotten are from the back of GMC/Chevy third lights on the laser. I have thought i picked up a few from trucks or cars with the park sensors on the radar. I have had my unit for almost 4 years with zero problems. Can this false be from an outside tower or just the phone searching?
V1 Tech informed me it was my new cell (CMDA frequency) search for searching for a "Sprint" tower.
If you have Sprint or Verizon according to V1 it is a more common problem related to their cell phone
frequencies searching for a tower. Try and turn your phone off when you get false or random signals and see if that helps.
my x-band (belltronix) goes off when driving by a gas station and car dealer ships/parking lots...it also goes off whne driving by a warning sign ( where it tells you when you are driving to fast and show you how fast)....
Nicholas, your false warnings/bogies from construction sites, speed monitoring systems, gas stations are related to their use of an X-band-like radar signal to detect either speed, motion of incoming/outgoing customers on automatic doors, or on construction vechiles that use public highways. Many Tractors, Combine's and other Farm equipment also have such transmitters to provide warning to those of use with radar detectors of a slow moving vehicle or construction ahead.
Valentine 1 did recommend keeping your Cell Phone at least 4 ft away from your detector and/or moving from the "little" L setting (hypersensitive esp. in X-Band) to the less sensitive but effective
"Big" L setting. This seems to have helped but when I'm in an area where I have no coverage simply
turining off the phone until I'm in an area with coverage is more convenient and effective.
Would never switch. Can't live without the arrows, moreover, none of the radar detector data and
comparisons demonstrates any one brand to significantly more improved or better than others. V1 is consistently in the top 2 or 3 depending on how the data is analyzed and presented.
Remember: It is the theory that determines what facts are observed.
I have certain places that set off my V1. This includes some speed checkers (for traffic control) over the highway and a few local stores. I can mentally filter them out, so they don't bother me. i can easily live with a few false positives than give up any of the protection. A week ago on a trip back from MSR, I was coming into Benbrook coasting close to triple figures. Approaching the town I got a very short (about 1 second) single low strength beep (single light) in K band. It just came on and came off. I immediately started to think and didn't know of anything that would give a signal in any band around there, so I hit the brakes rather aggressively. Sure enough about 3-4 seconds later there was a Benbrook police officer on the side of the road using instant on. Being at night in a more rural area on an unlit road, I could nto see the officer; but the V1 did. The V1 has saved me from yet another ticket.
Since getting my V1 about 4-5 years ago, I have only once gotten a ticket: instant on with Laser. The results speak for themselves and hence not an issue to live with a few false signals.
02, this is totally different false. I have had this detector for 3.5 years and get the occaisional false signals. This new false signal is constant. My detector did not stop warning for 45 minutes straight.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.