Rennlist

LVDell - have you seen this?

Add to repair workspace

New repair projectOpen repair workspace

Original source

10 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis

THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHLVDell - have you seen this?

Leading reported evidence

Use september as spring training

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
I just love how we use September as spring training for Schilling!
Original post Read captured discussion
LVDell - have you seen this?

Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Use september as spring training' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use september as spring training' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 10 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Use september as spring training

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion
I just love how we use September as spring training for Schilling!
Original post Read captured discussion
LVDell - have you seen this?

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

10 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Outcome without a verified action link
The link didn't work for me.
Original post Read captured discussion
No unique explicit quoted action; no causal link assigned

Generation: 20261026T165820Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Dell - I saw this post on the GT2/GT3 forum. I know you said you wanted to wait until next Spring, but this looks like a pretty good price. He is going to trade it in on 9/15. https://rennlist.com/forums/996-gt2-gt3-forum/222887-first-85-k-gets-my-gt3-i-m-nuts-mrsp-119k.html FYI, Tim

POST 2Original post

The link didn't work for me. Try this. -Darren

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Mitty - Thanks for the heads up! I have corrected my link, so it should work now.

POST 4Original post

I did and would have been all over that especially for that price but I want to pay cash for the car and cannot till the spring. Bummer. Sorry it took so long to post but I have been at the track all weekend!!!! Man I love putting the 996 to the test. But all I kept thinking was "how much more fun this would be in a GT3!!!!"

POST 5Original post

Dell.....the pennant race is tightening up a little......squirming in my seat!!!!!! what about you?????

POST 6Original post

Starting to worry. I just love how we use September as spring training for Schilling!

POST 7Original post

I'm in NYC, and going to Yankee Stadium tonight. They're playing the Devil Rays.....can you imagine that the Yanks are 4 and 9 against the Devil Rays?

POST 8Original post

The Tampa Bay "Double A's" seem to have the Yanks number this season!

POST 9Original post

They certainly did tonight, although I was still glad to get to see a game at the mecca of baseball!!!!

POST 10Original post

Well you got it correct.......mecca (litlle m) is Yankee Stadium and Mecca (capital M) is Fenway. Just thought you needed clarification

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.