11 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHCustom Made
Leading reported evidence
Replace suspension stuff though
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Maybe that's because I'm always changing suspension stuff though which could not be done with this type of stand.
Leading evidence: 'Replace suspension stuff though' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace suspension stuff though' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
It doesn't seem any safer than jackstands, and it will take a lot longer to use than jackstands.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
11 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T205155Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I can make those for you.... might be fun...
Ed
but what's the purpose of them.....
(aside from having no wheel on it... its not lifted... we could make tham taller?)
I think they're mainly used in car shows to show off brakes. Another reason they're soo short is because generally the other 3 wheels are still on the car when they're used.
I could see a use for a taller version though. However most of the time, I still see jack stands as "more" useful. Maybe that's because I'm always changing suspension stuff though which could not be done with this type of stand.
Hi,
No offense, but what is the point of that contraption? It doesn't raise the car enough for you to work on. To use it, you need to raise the car off the ground and remove all the wheels. It doesn't seem any safer than jackstands, and it will take a lot longer to use than jackstands. When the car is supported like that you can't work on the suspension either.
I would stick with a good jack and jackstands, or a good garage lift.
Barry
Thats what they are.... now that I think about it, its a good way to show off some parts....
Ed:
Im just brain storming.... need to come up with a widget so I can retire.
Good to know you can make custom parts...
Barry ... no offense taken
Maurice... theres cheaper widgets out there for that.
