Rennlist

rookie mistake & part nbr request

Add to repair workspace

New repair projectOpen repair workspace

Original source

9 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis

THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHrookie mistake & part nbr request

Leading reported evidence

Set torque wrench

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster
Last night I made a rookie mistake and set the torque wrench to 81 foot lbs.
Original post Read captured discussion
rookie mistake & part nbr request

Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Set torque wrench' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Set torque wrench' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 9 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Set torque wrench

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes: 0
Unsuccessful attempts: 1
Discussions

Read evidence and context

Discussions that contain suggestions: 1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion · Original poster
Last night I made a rookie mistake and set the torque wrench to 81 foot lbs.
Original post Read captured discussion
rookie mistake & part nbr request

Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

9 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T174436Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Last night I made a rookie mistake and set the torque wrench to 81 foot lbs. instead of 60, as the workshop manual states. The result was the bolt broke before I got to 81 foot lbs. Luckily, it broke off, exposing enough threads to unscrew what was left, with my bare fingers. I'm going to play it safe and order six new bolts. Can anybody give me a hand w/ the part number?

POST 2Original post

You are lucky. By the way I've noticed some of those WSM conversions are off, I normally take the Nm and run it through a calculator/converter to get ft lbs. 90006712309 SCKT SCREW 10X50

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Quotes source post: 8865084

Good point. Thanks for the tip. I found a slightly different part number: 900-067-123-02, available on Pelican.

POST 4Original post

That P/N is fine if you are buying from Pelican.

POST 5Original post

I'm confused. You broke the bolt off somewhere between 60 and 81 ft/lbs which seems odd in and of itself, but then you were able to unscrew it with your fingers? You have very strong fingers.

POST 6Original post

Ive also seen the Nm to ft/lb conversions wrong in the manuals -- Nm x .737 for ft/lbs

POST 7Original post

With the flange of the half shaft under the head of the bolt and the torque applied you could break off the bolt. Once the flange of the half shaft is removed there is no torque on the shaft of the bolt.

POST 8Original post

2 900-067-123-09-M260 Pan-head screw, M 10 X 50 Brand: O.E.M. M 480 12 NLA (2) OEM-99951004109 Pan-head screw, M 10 X 65 M 249 12 $4.50

POST 9Original post

Quotes source post: 8867622

That is the wrong P/N for his car. He does not have M249 (automatic) transmission.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.