28 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHLittle photoshoot with the new ride
Leading reported evidence
Use circular polarizer
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I use a mix of filters but mostly for car shots I use a circular polarizer.
Leading evidence: 'Use circular polarizer' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use circular polarizer' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
I use a mix of filters but mostly for car shots I use a circular polarizer.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
28 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T212127Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
So the girlfriend and I took the cars out on a little cruise on Saturday. We decided to stop and do a little photoshoot. As I mentioned in my other thread I do photography on the side so you will all be seeing a lot more pics in the future. But for now here are a couple from the shoot.
nice pics -
RE the wheels - they are differant, and that is kind of cool because the car is pretty differant too... maybe adding spacers would be good in the rear - but getting rid of them because they need spacers?
anyhow its a personal taste issue - you like em'
Nice photos. Is that a red caliper reflection in the lip of the rear wheel? Did you use a lens filter of any kind. Welcome to the forum! I'm partial to yellow as well!
On my computer
Who makes spacers and what size would you suggest?
Yes that's a reflection of the red calipers. I use a mix of filters but mostly for car shots I use a circular polarizer. I didn't use anything for these though.
[QUOTE=Toomanycars;8279302]
Who makes spacers and what size would you suggest?
Would go with H&R for spacers. Not sure what size just based on the pictures. With the wheel width, tire dimension and offset we could make a suggestion...
http://www.trakplus.com/
i also would not dump the wheels if you like them.
and if those wheels are really 2 or 3pc wheels, i bet those wheels cost someone a pretty penny too once upon a time.
the front wheels definitely do not need a spacer.
the rears, because of the drop in ride height, might not be able to take much spacer on there based on the side profile shot of your car. either 5mm or 7mm. porsche, h&r, fvd all make spacers. its a piece of metal, so quality is a non issue.
