32 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHCraigslist find of the year!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Leading reported evidence
Check before listing
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Craigslist find of the year!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Read full discussion summary
Leading evidence: 'Check before listing' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check before listing' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Craigslist find of the year!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Coverage and how to read this overview
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
32 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T194705Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
That car is WAY bitchin. And only $35,000 !
kevjandon, please edit the link out of your post so I don't have to deal with a lot of competing buyers. This thing could easily be bid up to $100k.
Phil
Sorry to burst your bubble, but that car is from Orange County and is simply posted in the Vegas craigslist.
That is a southern california disaster.
Vegas Rocks!!!
I have to say based on pictures alone the Porsche replica looks like it took a lot of work and the body panels look good. The Ford GT replica in Canada looks like a 16 year old hacked it up...
that is freaking nasty !! OMG the steering wheel and pass airbag
uke:
all that work and it still has a cassette storage bin !!
nice clean looking E-Brake too
that is one ugly POS !!
should be enough clearance up front... I could put a coffee cut on top of the tire and miss the fender
I just don't get the idea of buying a fake, especially for $35,000 ? Why not just pick up a nice 911 and drive the real thing instead of a Toyota MR2 with that "Coating"?
Like Shark Attack said, I too would bet that both the buyer and seller own Fake Rollies.
I am a watch collector and I get that question from people from time to time about whether I wouldn't rather just buy a fake Rolex, or a Fake Panerai? And I just stare in disbelief whenever I am asked that. I just don't get that mentality?
My younger brother goes to China a couple times a year and last year he brought me back a fake Daytona Rolex, and it is a tad bit scary, but the damn thing looks pretty real? Most of my friends cannot even tell the difference when I show them my real one and the fake one. But when they learn a little about the real one then you can see the light go on in their head.
But, C'mon for $35k you can get a pretty decent car these days...
So many cars, so little time. The Fiero/Carero GT is my fav! Kicks ***. Cleaner than my old 4S, too. But, I do love the "swade" seats in the GT3. I just can't decide....
