fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Camber specs on a lowered C4S

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
4 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHCamber specs on a lowered C4S

Leading reported evidence

Run 2.5 degrees in the rear

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I run -2.5 degrees in the rear on my car, but that's because the factory adjustment is maxed out due to how low it is (I also don't have adjustable dog bones yet), I'd prefer to be more in the -2.0 area.

Camber specs on a lowered C4S
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Run 2.5 degrees in the rear' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run 2.5 degrees in the rear' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 4 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 1 other evidence results

Run close

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I usually run close to zero toe in the rear for tire life purposes, but I'm trying out a very aggressive setting of .45 degrees of toe-in the rear right now and it handles great, but I don't anticipate that my tires will last very long, so I'll probably be dialing it back a bit sometime soon.

Camber specs on a lowered C4S
Frequently discussed actions (2)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Run 2.5 degrees in the rear

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Performed · outcome unconfirmed

I run -2.5 degrees in the rear on my car, but that's because the factory adjustment is maxed out due to how low it is (I also don't have adjustable dog bones yet), I'd prefer to be more in the -2.0 area.

Camber specs on a lowered C4S

Run close

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

I usually run close to zero toe in the rear for tire life purposes, but I'm trying out a very aggressive setting of .45 degrees of toe-in the rear right now and it handles great, but I don't anticipate that my tires will last very long, so I'll probably be dialing it back a bit sometime soon.

Camber specs on a lowered C4S
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

4 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T065735Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

hi, I am about to install dogbones for my C4S. The car has stock suspension with lowered springs (H&R). I want my rear tires to last longer, so I would want more neutral camber. What is the alignment camber spec most people have without affecting the stock handling too much? I do an occasional DE also. Thanks,

POST 2Original post

In terms of tire wear, you should probably pay more attention to toe-in rather than camber. Excessive camber does cause premature wear of tires, but not to the same degree as too much toe-in. I'd need to go back and look at my specs, but off the top of my head I think you can go up to -1.5 degrees without excessive wear.

POST 3Original post

In the front I run -1 degree of camber in the front and .11 degrees of toe-in on each side. It tracks nicely on the freeway and is stable at high speeds, but I think I'm going to add a little more camber the next time I align it (more in the -1.5 degrees range). I run -2.5 degrees in the rear on my car, but that's because the factory adjustment is maxed out due to how low it is (I also don't have adjustable dog bones yet), I'd prefer to be more in the -2.0 area. I usually run close to zero toe in the rear for tire life purposes, but I'm trying out a very aggressive setting of .45 degrees of toe-in the rear right now and it handles great, but I don't anticipate that my tires will last very long, so I'll probably be dialing it back a bit sometime soon.

POST 4 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Thanks everyone. Will try some of those settings.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.