12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHNR Auto Gauges - Is this normal?
Leading reported evidence
Install set and they looked great
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Install set and they looked great' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Install set and they looked great' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T005001Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I ordered a set of those a year or so ago and sent them back as I was not impressed with the quality. Found a set of OEM's on eBay. Difference is night and day...
By the way whitegauges.net gauges are an absolute joke. I sent those back at first glance.
These look good but the defect is horrible. The light doesn't shine through as nicely as my black OEMs. It looks kind of faded.
Ok so I returned these a few weeks back because of the obvious defect.
When I purchased silver bezel rings off of eBay (not realizing the vendor), this is what I was told:
"We received your Ebay order for our bezels.* We sell to many Porsche dealers and other related companies around the world.* Although we have sold hundreds of sets of these bezels we feel that perhaps you are too particular and might find perceived flaws.* In the manufacturing process some of the bezels have a slight rough part along the edge.* This is not seen when the bezels are installed but is noticeable when you hold the bezel upon opening the box.* Rather than go*back and forth with you and your probable dissatisfaction, we feel it is better for you to cancel your purchase through Ebay.* In our years in business we know that certain people can never be satisfied and find something wrong that the majority don't even notice.* This is not a criticism but our observation.* People that are engineers seem to be the most difficult to deal with in this situation.* We hope you understand our position."
LMAO I've never seen anything like this before.
