6 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHAnother Suspension Question - C2 Cab
Leading reported evidence
Run on low and i need
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
The only good part is I'm delaying forking over another couple grand but my mod-meter is running on low and I need to do something soon before I start experiencing symptoms of mod withdrawl.
Leading evidence: 'Run on low and i need' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run on low and i need' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Run on low and i need
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
The only good part is I'm delaying forking over another couple grand but my mod-meter is running on low and I need to do something soon before I start experiencing symptoms of mod withdrawl.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
6 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T005001Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I've read about as many posts as I can to a point where I might be thoroughly confused now
I'm going for a new suspension for my 2002 C2 Cab and just when I thought I'd settled on the RoW M030, I decided that was just an interim, small change that I should pass on. I think I like everything I'm reading about handling and definitely want a bit more lowering that the X74 has to offer so I'm now settling on the X74. Problem now is it looks like the X74 is not offered for Cabs. What's the story here? I see posts about Cabs with X74 but also see where X74 is not offered for the Cab.
As I said, I'm now thoroughly confused. The only good part is I'm delaying forking over another couple grand but my mod-meter is running on low and I need to do something soon before I start experiencing symptoms of mod withdrawl. Please answer before I have to begin attending 12-step for modding.
I have the same car. H&R makes cab springs and they aren't as bad as people make them out to be. Wheel gap is perfect but they are as bouncy as stock. It's just a cosmetic upgrade IMHO. My plan is to upgrade to a proper set of pss9s when I blow out my stock shocks or find a good used set.
The X74 works on the Cab no problem. I sold mine to someone who installed it on his Cab and loved it. Here is another:
http://www.trainweb.org/jlsrr/pictur...he/porsche.htm
Yeah I'm sure you could put any c2 coupe suspension on any c2 cab. The weight difference is only 150lbs. The only disadvantage is that the extra weight is over the rear and the x74 isn't adjustable.
I was going through the same thing you are and ended up with the RoW M030 and couldn't be happier for a primarily street driven 996 with 2-3 DEs per year. The X74 is fine for the cab even though it's not listed specifically for a cab.
The main deal breaker for me is the X74 is lower than I wanted. The RoW dropped just enough to take out the bad gap and firmed it up big time...very different than stock. The only downside it's a bit harsh over bad roads. Good luck with your decision.
Call Sunset and tell them you want X74 on your Cab....I bet they know how
as for the ROW (sorry James) I agree.... just an interim step
As for all the "harsh ride" posts from people who dont have "more cowbell" I just put about the max size torsion bars (read springs) in the 3.2 and can tell you - yup... its a little harsh on a few spots of very rough road, but 98% or more of the road its AMAZING! Glad I went with MORE
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
