12 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHreplacing OEM tires with N-rated tires
Leading reported evidence
Install when i bought car used last june
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
New tires fitted when I bought car used last June.
Leading evidence: 'Install when i bought car used last june' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Install when i bought car used last june' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
New tires fitted when I bought car used last June.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I've run Pirelli and Michelin tires on my Boxster -- last 3 or so sets being Michelin tires -- and I like both Michelin and Pirelli.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
12 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T200546Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I have the OEM Michelin PS2s and have loved them, but have to get a new set of fronts/rears. I'm interested in others experiences with other N-rated tires (Pirelli or Contis). How does it compare with the experience of the PS2s? (I have loved the PS2s but as we all know, the Pirellis are slightly less money and the Contis are significantly less).
PS I'm not interested in non-N-rated tires, I know lots of people use them but I"m sticking with just the N-rated....thanks in advance for any experience you guys have.
I have the conti 2s which are N rated and OEM. I like them.
My local dealer tech informed me that (with drving style being equal) the PS2s wear faster than the Pirellis and the Contis.
I would imagine max grip is superior with the PS2s so it is a tradeoff.
All depends what you are looking for. If you don't track your car, the Contis may provide you with a less expensive option.
The contisportcontact2 tires aren't that great... save your money and don't bother with an N rated tire. When I have to replace mine in the spring, I'm going with the Sumitomo HTRZ-IIIs.
But hands down, the best performing summer tire is the PS2, so if you have them and you like them, you aren't going to find anything better.
Running Continental tires on my 03 Turbo. New tires fitted when I bought car used last June. The Conti tires appear to be holding up well and I do not see any reason for me to try another brand. Can't comment on how well they compare to a different brand of tire on the same car though.
I've run Pirelli and Michelin tires on my Boxster -- last 3 or so sets being Michelin tires -- and I like both Michelin and Pirelli. The Michelin tires seem to give a bit more tire life than the Pirelli tires and the Michelin tires remain a bit quieter as they get worn and older compared to the Pirelli tires.
Frankly, though I don't really see any major differences. I went with Michelin tires just to see if they were any better than the Pirelli tires and as I noted above they are a bit better but not signficantly so. The Michelin tires were very close (within $100 IIRC) to the cost of the Pirelli tires so I opted for Michelin tires.
I don't think you can go wrong with any of the 3 brands. Shop for best price and when I buy tires from dealer I ask for and sometimes -- almost always get -- an alignment included for less than its stand alone cost. I would pay full price for an alignment though if I felt the alignment needed based on the tire wear patterns of the old tires. No matter which tire brand you select be sure car alignnment is spot on and be sure you keep tires properly inflated.
Sincerely,
Macster.
thanks everyone for the input....I was kinda considering Pirellis but it sounds like (no pun intendeD) that they are noisier.....maybe I will seriously investigate the Contis, since people have had good experiences....
As I said, you won't find better tires than the PS2's which you currently have. They are the undisputed benchmark for performance street tires.
If you are looking to save some money, then go with the Sumitomo HTRZ-III's, as they are better than the Conti's and considerably less expensive.
- Anthony