29 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHLED fog lights
Leading reported evidence
Repair from a front end wreck
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I'm not trying to be an *** either, it just looks like a really bad repair from a front end wreck.
Leading evidence: 'Repair from a front end wreck' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Repair from a front end wreck' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I have already been down this road with him about using the "text message" junk to communicate here.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
29 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T212127Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
what ?
the funny looking oval badge with a black bot in the center or the black tape across the license plate...
IMO - Yes to both
Whoops, you didnt mean the "www.iJDMToy.com" in white across the hood I hope
OK, I can't stand it anymore.
A grammatically correct way of stating the QUESTION would be:
"Would you consider installing this/these on the front of your car?"
You've posted the same crappy thread title at least 4 times.
p.s. To answer your question: No, too ricey.
Flash, just so you know, I am
not
laughing at you.
I have already been down this road with him about using the "text message" junk to communicate here. Obviously, my comments had little impact.
Everything he's posted as been complete crap for his car. Ironically I was thinking about posting a new topic "Maci911, would you consider using this on your car?" with a picture of a car crusher inside. Once completed he could go purchase a nice Corolla, add the Type-R stickers and all the "mods" he's been posting. It would be more fitting.
Fine, personally I think the front of that car would look better in black or guard's red rather than the yellow car you posted. If you are refering to the lights I'm in favor of the amberectomy, but I'd only use those fog light bulbs if they match the color temp of the HID bulbs.
I believe IB should collect money from advertisers, not users. The policy carried over from the privately owned Rennlist days, it's not an IB requirement, it's just icing on the cake for them. I pay money for other forums (S2KI as an example) but it's to support the site's private owners, instead of "the man"
And I'm not saying that everyone should stop paying, but at this point I don't see the membership as a benefit to rennlist's improvement so I'm personally a lot less likely to pay for a membership. I certainly don't see anything wrong with others who feel the same way, nor do I feel that it makes the content posted by regular "users" to be less valuable to the community.
And maci, my posts on other IB owned forums are more valuable to them than your $17.50 a year is.
I don't have a 996, that would be obvious if you look at my other posts on here. I'm looking for one, but haven't found the right car yet. I'll be sure to post pics when I do. It won't have any of the ricer parts you post about on it
I'm sure most 996 owners won't like me, I don't care about my cars being clean, as long as they are mechanically perfect and get driven on as many tracks as possible.
BTW, you should really get that front bumper fixed, or maybe it's just the pic, but the alignment on that bumper looks really bad. I'm not trying to be an *** either, it just looks like a really bad repair from a front end wreck.
Here's my last autocross/hpde car which I sold a few months ago. Not a p-car obviously, but you'll notice a lack of ricer mods too.
what's really bad is when a "USER" can see how stupid a thread is
(trust me Dave, I wont hold your status against you... but SOMEONE keeps pointing it out as if we all should somehow be mad at your status and somhow because you are a user you dont have a valid opinion or insight.)
What an *******.....just because you contributed a few dollars to a site doesn't make you superior to someone who didn't, or just because you own a Porsche doesn't make someone who doesn't own one a dreamer. Anyone can afford a 911 today. I guess that's probably how we have some Porche owners on this board with little respect for other fellow members. Some people can't be "all that" if they can't even compose a simple post with correct grammar.
Done!!!
Guys, the
Ignore List
works great! You can see that the person has posted something, but you can't read the contents of the post.
Click on
User CP
at the top left of your screen.
Under
Settings & Options
, click on
Edit Ignore List
Add the ID of the person you want to ignore
Click on
Save Changes
