56 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHI saw a Red C4S (or C4) in Dallas......
Reported or suspected cause
prozac
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Identified cause
1
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suspected cause
...and you thought that it was the Prozac that was making her smile for no reason.
Leading evidence: 'prozac' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'prozac' (1 discussions; 0 report identifying it and 1 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Check ( i am only a year younger than you)' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that suspect a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
#3) realize you're really starting to age - check ( I am only a year younger than you)
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
#2) gradually stop driving the P-car - check (no job, no place to go!)
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Ahhh, so now the REAL story is out as to why you didn't want to replace your surrogate for a pair of socks.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
56 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T022239Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
When I was in Dallas earlier this week, I saw a Red C4S (or C4) in the parking lot at the corporate offices of a grocery company located at the corner of Beltran and Freeport Parkway. Does it belong to a Rennlister?
Coming back from lunch, we truned the corner in the parking lot and were heading directly into the sun, so I couldn't make out the entire rear badge because of the glare. I'm 90% certain it was a C4S, but that other 10%.....
Too right, not only were you not able to tell the 4 from the 4S, but you were so slow that you didn't whip out your cell phone and take photos to post here.
Come on man, you're losing it?!?!?
Ahh, a man after my own heart.... I just want to cell phone to do the a good job of making phone calls. Unfortunately, the cell phone manufacturers seem intent on cramming more junk into the phones that we don't need.
My phone (a Sony Ericsson) has lots of cool features that I totally ignore. I only bought it because it was a quad band phone that I could use anywhere in the world.
< Tim thinks to himself > DOH!!! This thread has turned into a nightmare!!
I have set myself up to lose all of my credibility on Rennlist. It's a good thing I didn't have much of that to begin with, other wise, this would really hurt! The worst part of it all is that I opened the door to let Phil and Wayne give me a rash of ****!
Yeah Phil, I know.... I KNOW!!!! I deserved that! But I have no pics to offer, 'cuz my phone only makes phone calls, just like my camera only takes pics! I am so embarrassed!
It really sucks being on YOUR side of the fence! The only thing I can take solace in is that, unlike you, I don't reside there permanently!
My cell phone is 7 years old. When my daughter, and later my wife, "needed" (a.k.a. wanted) to upgrade their phones, I went with each of them. The guys in the cell phone place looked at my phone and once guy started laughing, because he had never seen one like mine because he had only been in the phone business for 5 years. They tried to talk me into upgrading it and told me I have $150 credit coming toward the upgrade. I said thanks but no thanks, because it still worked, has a speaker phone functionality, and has voice dial capability, which is all I need.
<Tim thinks to himself> Man, I hope I was successful in "high jacking" my own thread, so maybe everyone will forget about the original topic.
Tim, it starts with a shi-ty cell phone, then you gradually stop driving the P-car, then you realize you're really starting to age, then ..... POOF!! You live where I do! PERMANENTLY
Ok, let me see how I stack up with that criteria:
#1) ****ty cell phone - check
#2) gradually stop driving the P-car - check (no job, no place to go!)
#3) realize you're really starting to age - check ( I am only a year younger than you)
Oh, jeeze, that means POOF!! is next.
Phil, I guess I'm your new next door neighbor!
Phil, we are going to have so much fun! Every day after you leave for work, I'll come over and take your C4S for a drive in the country to let her stretch her legs a little. I figure she will have 15,000 miles on her before Super Bowl XLIII.
Oh, and make sure you chill some Coke for me, because sometimes I get a little thursty when I'm driving.
"My cell phone is 7 years old"
"Pretty please (with SUGAR on it) will you post a #%^$*&@ pic? "
I thought cut and paste, u know faster... 7 years old what does that look like...is the battery attached
Jerry
Tim, I'll tell you what. If we're neighbors, I'll buy the coke and you bring the spoon. Then we'll both chill, and you can drive my car all you like.
And, about that cellphone of yours - when you take a pic, please make sure you include the large vinyl backpack and connecting wires it came with.
Since we're dumping on poor Tim (and having fun doing it!), isn't the real point this.....
why would he think we'd care about a red C4S (or C4) in Dallas?
(this is what I call jumping on!)
Man, you guys are brutal! What I have done to deserve such treatment? On second thought, don't answer that question.... you will overload the server.
Ok.... OK!!!! Here is a pic of my 7-year-old phone. BTW, before anyone asks, the markings on the ruler are in inches, NOT feet!
OK, flame suit on� phone wrapped in asbestos� fire away!
Maurice,
There is a very good reason I have an interest in that particular car, but unfortunately, I am not at liberity to share that reason at this time.
Actually it does.... and to think that for the past 7 years I thought women were looking at my crotch... now I know they were lusting over my vibrating cell phone!
You are probably right about the Giants being turned into paper products. I just hope the Giants can keep it close to make it an interesting game. If it becomes too one-sided, I'll probably not watch the whole game.
I am a Cowboy fan and hated to see the Giants beat them in the playoffs, but I was actually expecting it for a a few reasons:
1. I think is is very difficult to beat the same team three times in one season
2. The Cowboys were not as sharp in the last 4 of the regular season as they were in the first 12 games
3. The Giants were getting better as the season went along and peaked at the right time.
I'm hoping for another game like the end of season game that we had with them. My prediction is a Patriots win by 3 points or less.
Many Superbowls are duds, but I think this might actually be a good one.
Cory, THANK YOU!!! I really like this phone. It doesn't take pics or wash my clothes, but it does what I need it to do. I'll be sad when it finally craps out.
[Image-only post; no author-written text. Original image references:]
https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/roflmao.gif
https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/roflmao.gif
Holy crap, how are you able to carry
that
in your pocket?! Or do you just hold it in your hand wherever you go? Features and 7 years-old or not, I'd dump that just for its inconvenient size.
