28 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHAnother e-bay scam
Leading reported evidence
Check 90k if you'll refund the difference
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The guy has purchased one thing ( a phone) in 12 months, $10,000 bucks says this is some nigerian who'll send a certified check for 90k if you'll refund the difference.
Leading evidence: 'Check 90k if you'll refund the difference' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check 90k if you'll refund the difference' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Check 90k if you'll refund the difference
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The guy has purchased one thing ( a phone) in 12 months, $10,000 bucks says this is some nigerian who'll send a certified check for 90k if you'll refund the difference.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
28 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T150039Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Not a turbo and i don't think he's mental enuff to do the swap
.
As DHinkle mentioned, in addition to the items that were missing, it isnt a wide body (no intake vents on the rear quarters)
Who would bid on a car with 4 pics and none of them very revealing. This is shady at best.
Did you follow the link to their website? They are some sort of high end recovery outfit. Maybe the car is a repo
well, whazzzzzz won the auction and has to pay $66K for this questionable car. Depending on the initial purchase date, it may not even have any warranty left, let alone any chance of a CPO or even getting a PPI.
Steve
This is what CarFax shows... no mention of Turbo... would CarFax show it as a Turbo?
2002 PORSCHE 911 CARRERA2/4
WP0CA29982S653187
CONVERTIBLE
3.6L H6 SFI DOHC / REAR WHEEL DRIVE
Standard Equipment | Safety Options
CARFAX Safety & Reliability Report
Now that's poetic justice, a scam car is won by a scam bidder! The guy has purchased one thing ( a phone) in 12 months, $10,000 bucks says this is some nigerian who'll send a certified check for 90k if you'll refund the difference. How does anyone take ebay seriously anymore?
There is no was that the buyer is associates with the seller because teh buyer ended the auction with a "buy it now" bid of $66K that resulted in seller fees in excess of $1,000.
