5 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHWheel Spacers For Free To A Needy Home
Leading reported evidence
Check wheels
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I don't mind passing them on after I finish checking the wheels...
Leading evidence: 'Check wheels' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check wheels' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
The set could then be sent to the next person in need.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
These could be used by these people as a test set to see how they work.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
5 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T225432Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I knew the free part would get a number of people looking. I bought a 5mm and 10mm set of wheel spacers for my car. They are NOT hub centric. As a result they are of no use to me. I will donate them to someone on the board that would like them. Here's the catch. I think there are a lot of posts asking if ____mm spacers wil fit on my car. These could be used by these people as a test set to see how they work. I know that this would have aided me in my decision making. If after the person checks out the set up, they can then buy a set that is hub centric. The set could then be sent to the next person in need. I know I have benefitted from the board and would like these to be Rennlist community property. Last person with them has to send them to whomever needs them. What do you guys think?
I'll take them! That's exactly what I need to do. I need to see how spacers would make my front wheels look. I don't mind passing them on after I finish checking the wheels...
Howdy Lee. I went withthe Boothe spacers and could not be happier. Ended up talking to the guy for about an hour; cars, weather, parts , copyrights, patents, guns, you name it. Really, really, nice guy. The Boothe spacers are a fine piece of work; excellent craftsmanship and perfect fit. I really would like to get a set of those cool center crests he sells, $600., I will have to wait on those. Getting some side skirts first. My wife brought home a couple of nice Orergon Pinots; went great with the salmon. I can't recall the name but I told her to get a case on order. Fantastic weather here today, finally.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
