16 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHMotor Mount Part Clarification...
Leading reported evidence
Fill so i like some verification
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed · Original poster
Someone on here mentioned that the turbo mounts were solid instead of liquid filled so I like some verification on that.
Leading evidence: 'Fill so i like some verification' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Fill so i like some verification' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Just installed Rennline solid mounts....will report back re: NVH....
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
16 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T035758Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Looking at the Auto Atlanta site, I noticed both sets of OEM numbers that references the turbo motor mounts and the regular non-turbo mounts both appear on the motor mounts.
I had read that the turbo mounts are stiffer but now I'm beginning to think they are the same as the non-turbo mounts. Can anyone make any sense from this?
http://www.autoatlanta.com/porsche-p...-05/109-00.php
http://www.autoatlanta.com/porsche-p...-05/109-00.php
Do you want stiffer OEM mounts? If so you want the 964 part number version which is the 'RS' motor mount. I believe there is only the 993 and 964 part numbers for the 996.
I rarely track this car so I didn't want to get the RS mounts and deal with NVH issues. I've read that the turbo mounts are in between the RS and stock non-turbo mounts but I'm trying to verify whether that is true or not. Someone on here mentioned that the turbo mounts were solid instead of liquid filled so I like some verification on that.
Can someone verify:
1. whether the pic I posted is OEM turbo mount
2. if turbo mount is any different(solid and stiffer) than non-turbo mount
TIA
I have RS mounts. There is a bit more vibration during start up when the engine is cold just like stock. You don't notice it much after the car is warm.
I just installed the turbo mounts. I'll snap a picture at lunchtime so you can see the part numbers. Pelican parts lists two different part numbers (although only different by a single digit). They also had the best prices by far (which I figured out after already ordering them).
http://www.pelicanparts.com/catalog/..._pg1.htm#item0
-Shawn
Fly....what do you think?
BTW...how easy is the install? I just got some WEVO SS mounts...I was going to install this weekend, but I remember reading on here (somewhere) that I need to buy new hardware too? Did you need to?
sean
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
