70 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHNew Sig - (yep...I am bored)
Leading reported evidence
Check back in a day or two
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Check back in a day or two' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check back in a day or two' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
70 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T220748Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Thanks for the kudos Brian...
yeah...I actually designed the Rennlist logo. I am an Industrial / Graphic Designer. I design everything from Racing graphics to corporate interiors and exhibits. And...every now and again...I get to play with cars.
Here is what I do:
Online Portfolio
Thanks guys...I like what I do. I get to be a 10 yr old for life.
Chad
Note to all who have received sigs. PLEASE PULL THEM AS SOON AS YOU CAN!! I am running out of space on my website. I will be deleting them within the next 1/2 hour.
Note to all who want one - Sorry. No more time. I have meetings this afternoon and business travel the rest of the week. I'll post again when I have more free time.
thanks and enjoy.
Chad
Johannes - here you go. Enjoy...!!
Sorry folks. Time is out. I have some work to do before I go out of town on business. I will check back in a day or two.
Chad
Oh boy...I went through the past messages and some of you linked to my server spot. BAD, BAD, BAD. Upon deletion, THEY ARE GONE. Pull them off my server as soon as you see your sig.
Robyn, sorry girl. Gonna have to remake yours.
Chad
Save it to your hard drive. Then find a nice cozy spot on the web that will host it. Then (in the "edit signature" section of Rennlist, link the photo to the body copy. That is all there is..
Chad
Rob, do you have any different shots? Meaning, this one's composition is so nice with the background, to crop it would lose its punch. Send me another if you would like.
Chad
