11 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHGIAC/EVO Update
Leading reported evidence
Replace headers
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Replace headers' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace headers' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Fix this time was to substitute paper filter for the K&N and reset MAF...so far, so good.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Moreover, the point of using the cotton-based filters is that the air flows through them faster eliminating any pressure build-up outside the filter and a negative pressure build (vacuum) inside the air box.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Moreover, the point of using the cotton-based filters is that the air flows through them faster eliminating any pressure build-up outside the filter and a negative pressure build (vacuum) inside the air box.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
11 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T105141Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I recently had the GIAC chip flash and Evo intake done on my 2001 C2 Cab. Although I am pleased with the performance increase, I have had two "check engine" light issues. These were due to MAF sensor errors.
The first time happened at a track day, shortly after the upgrade. Fix was resetting the MAF. It then happened again almost immediately. Fix this time was to substitute paper filter for the K&N and reset MAF...so far, so good. If it happens again, fix is to install new MAF which is a $650. Cdn. part
Conclusions:
1. The MAF is very sensitive to contamination. Oiled filters and Porsche MAFs don't seem to like each other. If you are having this upgrade, I suggest going with a paper filter.
2. I was very pleased with the follow-up and service received from Pfaff Tuning (in Newmarket, near Toronto). They are a division of Pfaff Porsche where I purchased my car. Gerry Bachman of Pfaff was at the track day and was all over the car when the check engine light went on. He also arranged all the service visits to Pfaff (no charge). If you are having this upgrade, I recommend that you check out the capabilities and service support of the tuning shop carefully. Pfaff Tuning gets a big thumbs up.
Cheers
Ian
No the K&N is oiled. There have been several posts on other forums where it has been said that our MAF dont like the K&N. Use OEM standard paper filter instead.
Hello Zookie
I don't have pics, but PorscheDoc is correct. Replacement is a paper cone filter, white in color and is the same size and shape as the K&N. My source is Pfaff Tuning (
www.pfafftuning.com
)
so this GIAC dealer told me a simple GIAC flash would cost $1000 and claim to improve at least 20 hp (which I don't know he meant whp or hp) but anyway, my concern is that would that be possible to have 20 hp gain? What if I have the aftermarket exhaust, would that make a different as well. Since I won't do dyno anyway, would there be enough power to actually feel it? which is all I'm asking for.
I have a 02 996
There's only two ways to gain any hp that you will feel. SC it or rebore the engine. In eather case it aint cheap.
If you want more horses you might start with the following before you go chipping it:
Rip out the spare tyre.
Rip out rear seats, carpet, radio and anything that adds weight.
Swap the exhaist for a fabspeed save 50lb
Replace the headers.
Replace panels with kevlar
etc etc.
Do that and you will probably gain 20 hp extra. But you still wont feel it.
The point of the K&N and BMC filters is that they are freer flowing. It's the over-oiling of them that 'may' cause a CEL as a result of the MAF sensor. Like some guys have said on other threads, a new K&N filter should be wrapped in paper and left overnight before usage. That will more than likely eradicate any concerns of a CEL.
As for the paper cone debate, I've not seen one anywhere. Who makes it? Moreover, the point of using the cotton-based filters is that the air flows through them faster eliminating any pressure build-up outside the filter and a negative pressure build (vacuum) inside the air box. If you're worried about any dust particles, a lot of reports that I've read on reports have demonstrated that the K&N and BMC filters do a might fine job of stopping just about everything except the air molecules themselves.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.