58 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHJust wanted to say good buy to 996 forum.
Leading reported evidence
Replace clutch, numerous oil leaks
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Based on my estimates, I had about $20k of warranty work done on the car (replaced clutch, numerous oil leaks, replaced catalytic converter, faulty fuel injectors, faulty ECM, MAF failures, etc.
Leading evidence: 'Replace clutch, numerous oil leaks' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace clutch, numerous oil leaks' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I bought the car from a use car dealer, brought it in for PPI with no issues.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Replace clutch, numerous oil leaks
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Based on my estimates, I had about $20k of warranty work done on the car (replaced clutch, numerous oil leaks, replaced catalytic converter, faulty fuel injectors, faulty ECM, MAF failures, etc.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
58 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T200546Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hi All,
I'd like to thank all of you for the supporting of 996 owners including myself. I hate to say this but i have to let my 996 go to get an E39 M5. The 996 looks really nice outside and i got alot of attentions to it. But the M5 on the other hand is a monster sedan machine, the build quality is really solid. I just drove it 100 miles and i did not want to get out of my car. It is imazing machine. I also bought 100km extended warranty for only $2500 on the top of 43k on the clock of my car. The only reason i let my 996 go was the fear of engine failure in my mind. I'm sorry that but it came with me everytime i drove it. I wish all of you would keep your car in good shape and out of all the issues.
Good luck,
Jim
Congrats Jim....sounds like it was just time for a change for you. And you certainly got a great car. Personally...my last 2 bimmers did nothing for me after the first few months....but that's me. I wouldn't put blame on your move to an engine that "might" fail....engines fail in every single make and model....you just hear more about the 911's b/c this place is the creme de la creme of ownership.
Anyhow, enjoy your ride....and without trying to sound discouraging, I wouldn't be surprised if you crave that 911 once again next spring.
Best,
J
After ripping apart my friends dash to install a radio (metal sculpture inside the dash) and ripping apart the trunk liner to install an I-Pod hook-up, I would definitely say that the Bimmer is better built than a 996. BUT, the issues all my friends have had (the list is extensive) with their Bimmers give them a black eye in the Quality dept.
i'm sort of afraid of the long term cost of ownership myself. I was diagnosed with a porous crank case on my 02 996 with only 8k miles on it and was first told by the dealership that I needed an engine replacement (i was 1 year out of warranty). I complaine to Porsch NA and they flew out and re-diagnosed and decided to apply an epxoy to the porous area. So far so good, but concerned about the potential for failure. But now what do i do? who would buy my car knowing its history? I would probably take a beating if i were to try and sell it. So I think I am "stuck" with it. Although it sure does put a smile on my face when I look at or drive it
Good luck with the M5 I heard they never have any issues at all. In fact BMW is losing money on everyone one they sold because nothing ever happens to them. Actually BMW doesn't even make replacement parts, there's no need.
Is that right??? they never break down!!!
Well, I gotta get me one of those M5's .....do you think they sell them up here in Canada!!!!
It would go real nice in my Igloo.....
I'm going to divorce my beautiful, loving, intelligent, well put together wife because I'm afraid that she will cheat on me. I'm going to get a more dependable woman who isn't as attractive, smart or as rewarding simply because everytime we go out she gets too much attention. I know she will cheat on me, I know it.
By the way...Sorry honey, for using you in a metaphoric way - I would never consider replacing you!
Funny....... I got rid of my 2000 E39 M5 in 2004 to buy my 996 when the M5 warranty was about to expire. My reason??? I was afraid of the long term cost of owning the M5. Based on my estimates, I had about $20k of warranty work done on the car (replaced clutch, numerous oil leaks, replaced catalytic converter, faulty fuel injectors, faulty ECM, MAF failures, etc. etc. etc.) My colleagues at the office would often laugh at me when I came to work in a Chevy Cavalier, Jeep Cherokee, or whatever loaner car they gave me for the week(s) my car was in the shop.
I should have known I was in for trouble when I started the car the morning after I brought it home and the check engine light was on and the car was in a low-hp limp mode. (required new ECM, SA recommended that I drive the car in limp mode for 6 weeks while waiting for the replacement part).
At any rate, compared to the M5, my 996 has been a great car!!!! I had a RMS at 7k miles, a speaker failure, and a door handle malfunction. I would have no concerns whatsover about owning this car our of warranty.
That was exactly what I was thinking when I first read this thread. I looked at M5's before I purchased my 996 and everything I read indicated they could be very maint. intensive cars.
I'd bet an e39 will cost much more over the long haul than a 996. They are beautiful sedans though...
I currently own an 2002 m5 it is an amazing machine, no complaints here. no need for any mods mine is completely stock and no ploblems what so ever. As for comparison to a 996....I had a 2001 c4 you are more connected in the p-car, but i can drive the m5 all day and not get tired, great for long trips. not bad in the performance catagory either. these cars are sleepers and should not be taken lightly because of big 4door sedans,when on the highway or street it will pull on a 996 easy....i always wanted the power from the m5 and the handeling of my p-car, thus i upgraded c4 to a turbo. now my garage is in perfect harmony.
I know how you feel. Every time I take my '01 3.4l out on the track and seriously flog it, I can barely have a great time because I am so worried that your engine may fail.
BMW has decided not to offer CPO on the new M5. Does that say anything? I used to like BMW's until my last M3 and my 07 550i. Both in the shop every other month at least. I've driven just about every type of rental car you can imagine. The people at the rental car place recognized me when I came in to pick up a car
I bought a beautiful e39 M5 myself this past July, and I love it. However, in the months leading up to the purchase I drove my 996 everyday, and I love it now even more than when I first bought it. They are both fantastic cars, in their own way. I am fortunate that I can afford to own (and maintain) both. If I had to sell one, it would be a tough decision.
Michael
Admittedly, I had a cursed car. The problems on my car were common (according to the m5 board), it was just uncommon that I had ALL of the common issues on my car. After 2.5 years of getting to know my SA personally, I think we fnally got the car sorted out well. Whoever bought it from the dealer probably got a problem free car and loves/d it.
As for long-term ownership costs, I've got to believe the 996 is cheaper. I say this based on my perception that
1) There are more indy shops qualified to work on the 996 than the E39 M5 (lower labor)
2) There are more used and aftermarket parts available (lower parts costs)
3) The knowledge base and support from the Porsche community and aftermarket on known 996 problems is more robust (more effective solutions)
Just my $0.02.
Steven C., are you still with us????
I would like to submit a due chevaux.....warranty is a rubber hammer.
But seriously: BMW does not give you a 50.000 or 4 year full warranty on the new M5??
Lets see.....the radiator is good to between 60 and 90K, the top hose outlet cracks. If you change the oil pump bolts and watch the radiator it's a pretty solid car.... oh yeah the radio has a tendency to loose the display
I was not trying to sound on one car or another since i have owned 5 Porsches and 11 Bimmers, i do know for sure which one is more reliable than another. I would agree that the older Porsche quality was rock but not on 996 line. I do all the services by my self on both Porsches and Bimmers, i could spend $$$ for most parts in both cars but can't afford a new engine. I got 100k miles warranty from different company than BMW.
Thank you some of you for your honest wording.
Jim
My 2004 C4S has over 60,000 miles with no issues... so I wouldn't lump a 6 year production of the 996 in one category. It's possible that the earlier production cars had more issues.
Had an E46 BMW and would not call the quality good. Down for 1 month with the electronic thermostat problem, all window regulators failed, sunroof motor failed, rear differential failed twice, rear frame tear issue, brakes were terrible, etc., etc. My wife refused to keep the car past 3 years. The inline six was butter smooth though...
My 2000 coupe had no issues. I sold it two weeks ago with almost 105,000 miles on the engine and original clutch. I'm looking at the Cayman for my next car if I can negotiate a sweet deal. I'm also curious to see how the new BMW 1 series looks in the flesh.
I did alot of searching in here to find out from most owners who had engine failure to see if they track their cars or not, will the engine go bad with normal driving? but i could not get enough infomations. I have owned my early 996 for 1.5 years with only 2500 miles. I bought the car from a use car dealer, brought it in for PPI with no issues. I took it home and enjoyed it for 500 miles the ABS light was on, i took it to Steven Creek Porsches and it was bad airbad module, 200 miles later after the rain found some water in the car, took it in to correct it , 300 miles later water pump and themostat went bad, then inigtion switch and final things are valve cover gasket and oil separator. Probably i was one of the bad luck 996 owners here. Now you understand why.
Thanks,
Jim
Gregorycarl, that was hilarious!!! So true! That just reminded me of why I drive a Porsche.
Every relationship takes a little work. And with each argument, I learn more about my lady and how to avoid any future incidents. That is pride in ownership
I thought everyone wanted a porsche for the gas mileage? Or the good excuse to not carry crud around.
I hope the car doesn't have some odd things like the nose dive when braking hard.
LOL, Yeah My partner has one.... to date this year his service costs are over my 996 and 928 service costs combined.
I think at one point he wanted to drive it off a cliff
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.