16 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHspy pics of new 911 coupe and cab (2011)
Leading reported evidence
Test concluded
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I think their initial testing concluded that since there were gaps between the bars on the "pedestrian pusher" it allowed enough air flow to keep the car stable at speed.
Leading evidence: 'Test concluded' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Test concluded' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
They use that same camouflaging technique for the rear of most of the test mules.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Test concluded
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I think their initial testing concluded that since there were gaps between the bars on the "pedestrian pusher" it allowed enough air flow to keep the car stable at speed.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
16 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T140027Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Have you seen these? It looks like a longer wheelbase (hard to tell), but also the rear ugly hump of the cabriolet is gone. The roofline of the the cabriolet seems to follow the lines of the coupe much better. what do u think?
http://www.carmagazine.co.uk/Secret-...yshots-230109/
Here is an early version of the "pedestrian safety compliance" solution that Porsche tested out on a 996. If fitted on a 997, painting it the same color as the car would, of course, be optional!
who cares about pestrians (yes deliberately ) I got a point system...the younger the more points because they are faster (JUST KIDDING!!!)
it is kind of good that cars become safer, since everytime someone gets hit by a car it is kind of a wast of a humans life!
Yeah, I've got waaaayyy too much time on my hands. Let's work on getting me a well paying job first and then I'll be able to the Porsche.
I think their initial testing concluded that since there were gaps between the bars on the "pedestrian pusher" it allowed enough air flow to keep the car stable at speed. The engineers also reported that the front end no longer feels "floaty" at speed.
I hope there's a lot of camouflage on it... From the broadside, it looked a little Mitsubishi-Eclips-ish... (Are blasphemers still stoned to death???)
Rudy
----------------------------
'01 Arctic Silver/Black C2 Cabriolet
'03 Silver F-150 Supercrew
