17 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHwould be nice........
Leading reported evidence
Check speed
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
well quick trying to stick your head thru the steering wheel to check your speed
Leading evidence: 'Check speed' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check speed' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Honestly though, the big numbers changing over under the tach always annoyed me like a warning light coming on each time I went from 47 to 48mph or something...
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
And please, don't anyone say something like "you should be using the tach and engine sound on the track...
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Honestly though, the big numbers changing over under the tach always annoyed me like a warning light coming on each time I went from 47 to 48mph or something...
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
17 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T073501Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
It would be nice if I could have my digital speedo in the tach instead of the temperature!!?? I dont think it takes a scientist to figure that one out
Can this be changed?
I like the speedo being smaller and to the left, it's unified w/the analog speedo, and that's where you look for speed, makes sense. Honestly though, the big numbers changing over under the tach always annoyed me like a warning light coming on each time I went from 47 to 48mph or something... Alas, Porsche has gone back and forth a number of times now w/the 997.
Hate it down there in the bottom left corner. Almost impossible to glance at when driving hard - particularly on track. The speedometer is essentially useless already with the huge increments. Really hard to understand why Porsche moved it for 02-04. It could not have been that difficult to put the computer functions in the tach.
And please, don't anyone say something like "you should be using the tach and engine sound on the track... racecars don't have speedometers... who cares how fast... yada, yada, yada..." I know all that, but this is a road car and basic info like how bloody fast you are going should not be hard to find.
Now THAT'S what I'M talkin about!!! Why would they ever change from this format, although maybe moving the temp outa there might simplify it a little.....but I'd accept this just fine!!
I've got a MK I, love the speed being in the tach window--makes it just one place I need to glance at. Sorry for piling on but I would hate it if it were over with the speedo.
Precisely! What blur...actually, my distant sight is fine, not so much up close looking at tiny hash marks on the speedo. I usually refer to the display under the tach as well.
Agreed. We don't even need an analog speedo anyway. Just put in the in the tach. That's how my old RX8 was and it was great. I believe the Ferrari 458 is like that too.
+1 from me on that.
I think the analog speedo is a total waste of space. I have the big digital numbers in the tach and that is virtually the
only
speedo info I look at.
Would have been more useful to have the analog speedo gauge be an oil temp/pressure gauge closer to where you can see the info, rather than stuck out on the end of the cluster (often obstructed by the steering wheel from my seating position).
However, I'm sure there is some DOT regulation that requires an analog speedo...
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
