50 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHOT: Which sports car are you?
Reported or suspected cause
modena
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'modena' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'modena' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Test before i read the thread and thought' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
And I did the test before I read the thread and thought for sure I could be nothing more..
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
This is the second time I've done this test with the same result
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
50 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T175704Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I am supposedly the Corvette -- which is only car in the list that I will never buy. Here is the list, BTW:
1360837 people have taken the Which Sports Car Are You? (Version 2.0) personality test
Here are the results so far:
Ferrari 360: 133155 (10%)
Lamborghini Murcielago: 89982 (7%)
Mazda Miata: 86862 (6%)
Honda S2000: 33333 (2%)
Dodge Viper: 75571 (6%)
Chevrolet Corvette: 360825 (27%)
Porsche 911: 199196 (15%)
Mazda RX-8: 81958 (6%)
Porsche Boxster: 20036 (1%)
Audi TT: 30420 (2%)
Mercedes SLK: 58845 (4%)
Ford Mustang: 119908 (9%)
Lotus Elise: 36087 (3%)
Nissan 350Z: 34659 (3%)
It stated:
"You are a Porsche 911!"
"You have a classic style, but you're up-to-date with the latest technology. You're ambitious, competitive, and you love to win. Performance, precision, and prestige - you're one of the elite, and you know it."
Jon, since I just recently became a 911... I was thinking it may not be a bad idea to keep a "Depends" nearby... just in case we get RMS or something like that
I'm a Porsche 911!
You have a classic style, but you're up-to-date with the latest technology. You're ambitious, competitive, and you love to win. Performance, precision, and prestige - you're one of the elite,and you know it.
Take the
Which Sports Car Are You?
quiz.
Looks like I am a Lamborghini Murcielago!
The woman and I differed on my opinion of the scalpel or sledgehammer. So in my mind I should be a 360, hers I'm the Lambo.
We all know who is right.
She's a 360.
This is funny my wife is a corvette, my old car which she did not like and told me to sell it and get a 911. Well I came out as a 911....I guess my wife knows me after all
Damn I really wanted to be Porsche....
But I'm a 360, I figured at least I wasn't a corvette, as I hate them.
And I did the test before I read the thread and thought for sure I could be nothing more.. or less than a 911.
But am I really high maintenance?
I'm a Ferrari 360 Modena.
"You've got it all. Power, passion, precision, and style. You're sensuous, exotic, and temperamental. Sure, you're expensive and high-maintenance, but you're worth it."
