17 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHFinally posting a picture
Leading reported evidence
Check weather
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
not to mention all that damn time filling out the log book, filing a flight plan, checking the weather and on an don and on !!
Leading evidence: 'Check weather' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check weather' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
It wasn't as funny as the 40-50mph cross wind when the wind did a 360 whirling change during touch down.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I wouldn't fly the 996 at night with only running light
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I'm sure the instructor I had out doing an instrument run sill laughs about it all the time.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
17 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T031046Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
p-car... you save 30 minutes pre-flight, 10 minutes run-up, and tie down at the end... not to mention all that damn time filling out the log book, filing a flight plan, checking the weather and on an don and on !!
however - nice plane
thanks for the pics!
once in the air - the puddle jumper kicks butt (no police to "slow ya down") but for me.....all the extra time on the ground...not my thing
spent WAY too much time at the airport as a kid
It was sad when they weren't making the small planes for the longest time. I experienced the seat sliding back problem on take off one time. I was out messing around in Oklahoma during my commerical multiengine land instrument course. It was kind of funny but I'm glad I could laugh with another pilot friend riding along. It wasn't as funny as the 40-50mph cross wind when the wind did a 360 whirling change during touch down. I was all ate up thinking planting the cessna just going off what was happening. Later a friend from Florida was telling me he saw my landing laughing about how he saw the wind sock do a 360 and wondered how I was doing out there. Good laugh now but could of been a disaster. I'm sure the instructor I had out doing an instrument run sill laughs about it all the time. I screamed at him what are you doing! I could of sworn we were both fighting for control of the aircraft. All that and now I remember him asking me before the flight if I'd like to do it anyway with the winds being high. If any of you flyers ever get a chance to pass by Clinton Sherman do so. It's a giant mega strip and spooky to see such a large strip with no large aircraft on it.
