18 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHAnyone notice higher volume highway patrols
Leading reported evidence
Use highways, since most highways have minumum speed limits
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
My Honda doesn't go fast enough to allow me to legally use the highways, since most highways have minumum speed limits.
Leading evidence: 'Use highways, since most highways have minumum speed limits' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Use highways, since most highways have minumum speed limits' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
The locals use laser on the streets, so radar detectors are really useless.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Don't even try using your V1 here, they will ****** that up and destroy it and charge you with a $500 fine.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
18 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261028T003752Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Folks,
I just drove down to DC and back on a business trip in my Pcar the past two days. It was amazing to see how many police cars were out there ticketing people. My V1 save me at least 4-5 times and other times there were unmarked cars pacing traffic.
Is the government so short on their tax revenue that they are just using this method to collect money.
Feel better now.
yup 100% agree....more laws, more fines, more patrols and more enforcement along with LESS FREEDOM
We also have cameras popping up everywhere.. even in public parks??? big Brother is getting TOO big, time to overthrow it,... then again we have become to comfortable to do that, and they know it.
E's $0.02
Come to Ontario. We are are living in a policed state, get caught 50 over our increadible low speed limits and they take your car away and leave you and your family on the side of the road.
Don't even try using your V1 here, they will ****** that up and destroy it and charge you with a $500 fine.
I drove through Ontario last month in a rented 4 runner from the US. While trying very hard to find a parking spot near the restaurant Opus, excellent dinner spot btw, a very nice parking enforcement officer told me that I can park anywhere and the Canadian government will not pursue cars with US plates.
I don't know if it applies to speeding tickets as well.
Here in the US we're lucky - in the UK they are looking at deploying the automated 'average speed camera' system to thousands more of miles of motorway.
http://www.speedcamerasuk.com/SPECS.htm
So you're under their watchful eye effectively for the whole trip - no slowing down just for the camera positions - your V1 is not going to save you.
It's cruise control, and sit back at the speed limit - you have no choice.
So until we get that system here in the Land of the free - let's enjoy what freedoms we have....
That is F'd up !!! We need to start working on Laser pointers that "blind" those bastards... any laser will work, but you have to hit the lens while driving... there is the trick.. any ideas?
So Cal freeways are still pretty open, very rarely see radar down here on freeways.
Sometimes people even move out of the fast lane, imagine that.... They always get a friendly wave.
The locals use laser on the streets, so radar detectors are really useless.
It's just a matter of time when fixed speed cameras will be everywhere, particularly on interstate highways. That's when the only place to have any fun at all with your car will be the track.
I really can't say it there has been an increase in highways patrols. My Honda doesn't go fast enough to allow me to legally use the highways, since most highways have minumum speed limits.
<pulling the BS lever>
come on, thats a good looking Honda.... sort of car thingy
LOL
Dont put it down too much ... afterall, you bought it and when you keep saying what POS it is, you are putting yourself down too... It was a well thought out plan, stick with it, and when the time is right, make a new choice...
Choices have to be enforced as good ones so we feel we have the power to make more of them!!!
Here in NJ, not only has there been an increase in police presence, the NJ Highway authority recently LOWERED the speed limit from 65 to 55 on a highly utilized 30 mile portion of the parkway. With very little signage noting the chages. Talk about a nightmare.
At any given time you have people doing exactly the limit (55) and those that didn't realize or don't care about the change, and are still buzzing down that road at roughly 15 mph over the 65 limit.
55 and 80+ on the same road - FUN!!
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.