26 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHA confused Porsche...
Leading reported evidence
Run across this
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Just stopped by here to cross-post a NJ drive thread and happened to run across this.
Leading evidence: 'Run across this' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run across this' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
26 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T183130Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Is it possible that I remember that from a magazine like Motor Trend or Car & Driver back around '86?
I hope that doesn't make me responsible for that thing.
Just stopped by here to cross-post a NJ drive thread and happened to run across this. Wow!
Actually....I don't think it's all
that
horrible...
Kinda cool in some ways, and sooooo different from the typical 911.
If I were to buy a 911, which I think is a gorgeous model, I'd still almost want this one just because it is sooooo unique. That's just the way I am....I like my 928 cuz it's not what you see every day on the road.
Of course, Kevin (hubby -- aka "The Guy") thinks they should have melted this one (
not
my 928!!) down for scrap metal years ago, but I don't care, I'm still into it quite a bit. LOL.
Thanks for sharing! I'll have to come back here more often.
That ugly thing has way more then 8.7k on the odo. Look at the pictures closely.
I am never this direct because I try and be respectful (for the most part).
Who ever built that should be shot and left for dead in front of the Pontiac Fiero Kit Car Clubs National Headquarters. Just because they kicked him out of the club, he doesn't have to come over to our side and build some monstrosity like that.
I was having such a nice calm day until I saw that.
There's a theory that our taste - or lack thereof - in cars follows the strength of the economy. We tend to buy more reserved cars in conservative colors during recessionary times and the opposite during boom times.
I'm sure in 20 years time, people will look back at our big *** SUVs with 26" chrome spin jobs and laugh their asses off.
That was the Gemballa Avalanche, I should know I still have the magazine layout of it with him sitting in it. This appears to be some crappy attempt to replicate that.
I'm actually MORE interested in who would actually buy that piece of crap.
That thing was valued at $160,000 in the 80s. Someone completely missed the boat by hanging on to it. Appreciation was NOT in the cards for that Testa-gross-a.
-td
OMFG.....but stop making nasty remarks about big SUV's with chrome rims!! They look and drive great..the only reason they won't be made in 20 years (or much sooner..how about a couple of months from now!!) is because of the OPEC with their BS cutting barrel production....but of course there is always natural gas!!
