18 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHStay tuned...the wing is in!!!!
Leading reported evidence
Run lighter wheels
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Run lighter wheels' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run lighter wheels' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
18 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T091943Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
OEM?! Absolutely! The car will have a full OEM aero kit. Minus, the rear flaps on the bumper (I don't care for those). The objective is now more clear. A lightweight, fast, incredible handling verison of the 996. My Carrera RS.
Stay tuned.
Chad
Yes, good plan. I never liked those rear spats either. In my opinion, the gen 1 aero kit is still the prettiest of all. As far as going lightweight, you might want to check the weight of those Calssic II wheels, they're not light at all.
I always thought the jury was out on those gt flaps. I have an aero coupe w/o the flaps.So the general opinion is "no flaps". I'll take under advisement. Congrats on the wing. Can't wait to see it...Jeff
I'd get the flaps because it is a part of the AERO kit. They're all designed to work TOGETHER by Porsche engineers spending time in the wind tunnel.
I agree that the first gen aerokit is the best looking out of all. For the streets, lower your car on a set of dished out 19s. It'll look incredible.
