22 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHPhoto Cop
Leading reported evidence
Run red and no kidding
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
Running a Red and no kidding on the hard breaking.
Leading evidence: 'Run red and no kidding' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run red and no kidding' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
22 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T044418Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
This prompted me to do an internet search and I found this, which should be of collective interest:
www.speedtrap.org
Seems they have national, detailed listings of speedtraps.
There was a segment on the news a few weeks ago about Culver City and their red light cameras. They have their yellow lights set to the absolute state minimum and the cameras set to snap a picture also with the minimum. In addition, the segment noted cities like Beverly Hills review the pictures and issue about 50 % tickets and Cilver City issues 83% tickets. So beware in Culver City. Their camera are absolutely set up to generate revenue.
Hard break my friend. I jus hope there aren't to many of those photo cops around in the Northeast! What did you get caught for anyway? Best wishes - Jay Gratton
Hard break != hard brake. Hard break == that's too bad. Hard brake == mash the pedal that makes the red lights on the back of the car light up. Not that there isn't a high probability that light is setup for revenue generation but there's no sign in that photo you'd have been rear ended if you'd tried to stop. I almost wish they would install the photo ticket system at some intersections around here as it seems the rules were re-written while I lived in CA so that if you see the light turn red you're entitled to pass thru an intersection and cross traffic be damned.
George Orwell was RIGHT!
That's really scary... the top of the pic even posts your speed. How in the world do you contest one of these tickets?
I'll keep this in mind if I'm ever passing through Culver, the City of Camera-ly Love...
Could be worse, I know someone who got one of those tickets in a rental car in NYC while he was here on business. They mailed the ticket to his home in Chicago. His wife opens the ticket, and calls him up PISSED OFF! The photo has the time and all that, so it was like 11pm, and it shows the people in the car as well. He just happened to be driving a co-worker home from the office...an attractive young female co-worker. Nothing truely was going on, but try explaining that to an irate wife over the phone...
here in Toronto as well
I don't mind as much if their is discretion. How many times does one enter an intersection, on a green, to make a left only to be cued up behind a "hesitant" driver and you both complete your turn on a red! Bet your plate will be the only one on the pic as you follow his butt closely behind to get the heck out of the intersection.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
