46 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHAm I getting ripped off?
Reported repair
Replace seal
Reported resolution
1
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report a fix
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported fix
After replacing seal, everything is good, no more leak.
Leading evidence: 'Replace seal' (1 discussions report resolution; 0 report an unsuccessful attempt). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'emissions, your car will not pass an inspection' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Replace seal' (1 discussions). For that action, 1 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. The most frequently reported fix is 'Replace seal', supported by resolution reports in 1 discussions. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause
The problem is emissions, your car will not pass an inspection with the check engine light on.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
so I went back and checked the rates with some of my receipts - in a couple cases the price was lower, in a couple it was higher...
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Sure, chain tensioners wear and need to be inspected/replaced at some point, and a broken tensioner can lead to expensive things like bent valves, but the penalty for a failed variocam actuator is usually a CEL, rough idle and some loss of performance.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
And the answer to misfire cylinder 6 is ---- incorrect IMS housing installed by the dealer.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Sure, chain tensioners wear and need to be inspected/replaced at some point, and a broken tensioner can lead to expensive things like bent valves, but the penalty for a failed variocam actuator is usually a CEL, rough idle and some loss of performance.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Anyway, $3000 is high, and oxygen sensors are not necessary, however I don't see this as a $600 repair, especially if the entire adjuster needs to be replaced, since the part alone is listed for over a grand and adds several hours of labor, and additional special tools...
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
BUT - I just had the trans replaced under CPO, bad 4th gear synchro, and while the trans was out they replaced the IMS seal, retainer, and new bolts - under CPO.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
46 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Outcome without a verified action link
I have a 1999 C2 and the CEL is on (non-blinking) with no change in performance.
I have a 1999 C2 and the CEL is on (non-blinking) with no change in performance. The dealer states I need Bank 1 cam adjuster, 2 oxygen sensors and seals for approx. $3000. I told them I'd let them know.
Thanks
Welcome!
Firstly either buy yourself a code reader or go to an auto parts store and have them read the code for you. Do a search here for the code and you'll have your answer.
hold on there, get a second opinion from another shop.
Now that is said... welcome to RL. We know you are at a stressful time in the ownership of your car. This is a helpful place to come. We request when you get time to post a little bit about yourself and your car along with a couple shots of the car. We understand that is not high priority today having had the $3k quote dropped in your lap, but seriously, get a second opinion. Also let us know your mechanical abillities and available time/space/tools to maybe do some of the things yourself.
Best of luck....
One last word... post results and follow up with us, it will help you down the road when and if something else comes along
Ed
+3 on getting the second opinion. Also tell they that you want to know what codes they are getting. I would have your local autoparts store read the codes so you know tham BEFORE you get the second opinion.
Welcome to Rennlist.
Again agreed on the 2nd opinion. Your location also would help as there are many of us across the country, one of us surely can direct you to a good indy shop.
Keep us updated and welcome to RL.
I would spend $50 on buying a ODB II reader instead of going to Autozone. The amount of times you can read the fault codes and then clear codes yourself is worth the money. Pcars have very sensitive sensors.
Absolutely...buy a code reader then share the code with us on the forum. Do that before you spend 3k. Often a CEL can be erased and won't appear again.GL.
If they say you need a cam adjuster, then there must be a leak. This probably has nothing to do with the check engine light. I think the o2 sensors and seals are fairly inexpensive to do.
A failed cam adjuster will not cause a leak but it will cause a CEL. The seals mentioned in the OP are the seals required when the cam cover is removed to replace the cam adjuster.
My cam cover seal did leak a little bit and I did not get a CEL so I guess my cam adjuster was OK then... After replacing seal, everything is good, no more leak. Cheers,
I've seen a failed cam adjuster (solenoid or the tensioner assembly can fail) cause blinking check engine light. Anyway, it is unlikely that you need two oxygen sensors at this time also. If they're quoting you for the chain tensioner/adjuster assembly, along with the solenoid (that part alone lists for around $1000), along with two oxygen sensors, I'd say the quote is only a bit high. However, often you can get away with just the solenoid, in which case the parts/labor should be well under $2k.
I would also get a second opinion. If you were local I'd be glad to help you out, but unfortunately you're not.
I have seen many of them break over the years, on BMWs and Porsches (mostly what I have experience with), but also on VW/AUDIs. I have a failed one sitting at the shop now!
The solenoid can go bad (and completely stop functioning). They most often fail and stop functioning completely, not offering any resistance to movement in either direction. The adjuster assembly's most common mode of failure is to get stuck in either the advanced (and that's the more common of the two) or the "idle" position. We are talking about the simpler early Variocam on the 3.4s here. Sometimes these can work themselves back to loose, if the contamination isn't bad, but with the labor involved, it could make sense to replace the whole thing while you're in there, depending on how dirty everything looks.
Believe me, if it's mechanical, it can fail...
I didn't read the seals were for the cam cover, though I thought o2 sensors have seals also, no? I just figured doing the cam ajuster requires more work like dropping the engine removing the cam cover and figured seals would be replaced at the same time. o2 sensors don't require any real work to be done.
I didn't know the cam adjuster throw a code or would be a non flashing check engine light.
Thanks for all the help. I will purchase a code reader tomorrow and am working on getting a second opinion. All I was told was I needed to replace the bank 1 cam adjuster and the price of the part was $1,040. Would my car's performance suffer if this was bad? The car runs fine. The dealership is 2 hours away. Unfortunately I have 3 dealerships in my area but they are all 2 hours away from my house.
On the 99 through 01 cars there's a solenoid seal on the cam housing, this is an external seal only and it's condition does not indicate or influence the operation of the solenoid in any way. Replacing the solenoid on the MK1 models (again 99-01 for the U.S.) does involve a fair bit of work, including removing the exhaust, and splitting the cam housing (upper half of the head). The cam tensioner assembly replacement only adds a couple of hours to the job at the point of solenoid replacement.
The oxygen sensors have crush rings on them that are technically single use, but they can be re-used without a problem. Replacing the solenoid or the entire chain tensioner/adjuster assembly does not require oxygen sensor replacement.
sleepmd; you're quoted for the entire chain tensioner assembly, not just the solenoid. You can test the solenoid separately to check to see if it functions. It sounds like the actuator is in the idle position, which indicates that you may only need the solenoid, and not the entire actuator assembly. Does the car idle smoothly? Technically, you'll take a performance hit between roughly 1400rpm and 5300rpm (from memory), though not very significant. The problem is emissions, your car will not pass an inspection with the check engine light on. Also, any check engine light is technically emissions related, the flashing light means immediate damage to emissions related parts may occur- this usually means just the cats though. Anyway, let me know if you need more info.
Retrieve the fault codes from your "NEW" OBDII code reader. write it down and then clear the codes and do a search here to find out what it is. Post it for us so people who have had these codes before can help you.
After that take the car for a drive and see if they come back. If they come back after driving, then it warrants further investigation.
So the cam adjuster is messed up. Not a big deal. Yes it does need to be fixed, but $3000???? Yes you are being screwed. Few hours of work and I do not see a code for any O2 sensors being bad. So 1 part, and some labor.. Maybe a $6-700 repair bill (including changing the oil and filter).
The solenoid is a part of the adjuster assembly. Replacing the solenoid may not fix the issue. I would not undertake the repair without further testing btw.
The repair is kind of a pain, particularly for bank 1, Porsche assumes the engine would be out for this. I've done it with the engine in the car, but particularly the oil scavenge pump retaining bolts take some creativity to pull out. I replace them with hex heads.
Anyway, $3000 is high, and oxygen sensors are not necessary, however I don't see this as a $600 repair, especially if the entire adjuster needs to be replaced, since the part alone is listed for over a grand and adds several hours of labor, and additional special tools...
wait... you did this?
Why - repair or maintenance?
did you change out the cam chain guides too?
Did you do a write up (link)...
Thanks, This is one thing I have on the back burner as a "maybe" for the maintenance list
ALSO - how do you guys get these prices? I see them quoted all over the place, is it you know or is there a way to look them up? Thanks in advance
Ed
Just a word of advice to the OP, the misfires are likely caused by the timing issues, so if I were you I would tell any mechanic who was doing the work that I only wanted the cam issues resolved (as Ahmet mentioned, it might make sense to do the tensioners when you're in there). Once you've completed this work you should reset the CEL, run for a while, and wait for the misfire codes to recur (which they shouldn't if the O2s are fine, coils are fine, etc) before changing O2 sensors or other parts.
Ed, Renntech has a database of US retail part pricing, but I believe you have to be a contributing member to view it. It is under the DIY Menu at the top.
http://www.renntech.org/forums/index...code=prices_us
This is a good starting point, but I always call Sunset Imports.
THANKS
so I went back and checked the rates with some of my receipts - in a couple cases the price was lower, in a couple it was higher...
these prices based on (MSRP) and IIRC Sunset sell for much less. So I guess its a good benchmark as to what you can "expect to pay" then you can go price shopping from there.
Again thanks
BTW - Obviously I contribute to Renntech, how can you have a Porsche and NOT ???
Ahmet replaced one because of a flashing CEL and a whole slew of codes, including indicated missfires on the opposite bank. In this case all that was necessary was to replace the solenoid, not the entire variocam actuator assembly. This job is mildly annoying if you have access to a lift. It would be theoretically possible with the car on jack stands but you'd likely need a small Asian child to remove the oil scavenging pump from the back of the head for you.
There was not enough time to take pictures for a write-up but the procedure isn't terribly difficult. I would not, however, recommend anyone attempt this repair if they don't have a fair amount of experience. If you don't position the crankshaft correctly before removing the cam cover bad things will happen. Expensively bad things.
Ed,
You mentioned that you have this on your list of maintenance items. I have to ask: why on earth would you consider replacing your variocam actuator if it hasn't malfunctioned? This doesn't seem to be a common failure. Sure, chain tensioners wear and need to be inspected/replaced at some point, and a broken tensioner can lead to expensive things like bent valves, but the penalty for a failed variocam actuator is usually a CEL, rough idle and some loss of performance. Also, I've seen brand new parts fail, on several occasions, which cured me of the "I might as well replace part X while I'm in there" syndrome. I mean, if I'm replacing the timing belt on a Honda with 90k miles I'll still do the water pump at the same time, but I wouldn't advise that you pro-actively replace your variocam actuator. Spend the money on something fun instead, like a track event
As for prices, there are lots of people that sell parts over the Internet (Pelican Parts, Suncoast, etc) who will be happy to quote prices for you.
- Rex
Thanks Rex, my reason is exactly as you stated, to get to the cam guides and swap those out. The variocam actuator needs to come out (is why I asked) and was surprised that the job was done in the car. My "maintenance idea" is the guides... sounds like you guys got those while you were chasing all the other issues.
Again, thanks for the feedback
2004 996 C2 43,000 miles CEL - misfire cylinder 6
My CEL came on last night after a cold start - blinking and message "drive to shop". Car ran a tad rough for a minute or two, then smoothed out and ran just fine - CEL turned off. Started the car this morning - no CEL for about 1/2 mile, then rough idle - CEL came on and stayed solid and message "drive to shop". Car ran fine - drove 20 miles to work with light on solid. Called the dealer - took it in this afternoon - light on solid from start and to dealer. Mechanic says "misfire cylinder 6" but stumped because car runs fine. He cleared the CEL - test drove it and it did not repeat. BUT - I just had the trans replaced under CPO, bad 4th gear synchro, and while the trans was out they replaced the IMS seal, retainer, and new bolts - under CPO. I drove maybe 100 miles since the service. As soon as I told the mechanic about the rough running - he looked VERY concerned - told me he didn't want me to take the car - and mentioned the IMS seal and timing - but again said the car should not be running strong if there was a problem.
I have to say that my Porsche a dealer has really come around and they treat me very well. Porsche said "rebuild the trans" I campaigned the dealer to make a case for a factory rebuild swap - it took them three days but somehow they justified it with Porsche warranty. IMS seal was seeping very slightly - again dealer handled it all through CPO. RMS perfectly dry as it was replaced at 22k miles in july of 2007. AND best of all - they have come to know that I go out of my mind over any rattle in the car. I don't even have to mention it anymore - any time it is in for any service - these guys go over the car and return it rattle free and always as "no charge" - it lasts for awhile.
I did notice two categories for misfire in this thread - 1) damaging to catalytic converter 2) emission relevant. I'll call the dealer tomorrow and try to get them to tell me which misfire code was on the read out.
And the answer to misfire cylinder 6 is ---- incorrect IMS housing installed by the dealer. They were honest and when I asked to inspect the parts and get the part numbers they willingly did so. The difference in housings was very obvious, they said the mechanic assumed it was an updated part. I am not real happy about running the car with an incorrect IMS housing - and when the dealer said it was a good thing I brought it in, I said maybe - perhaps I should have driven it until it grenaded- a new crate motor and rebuilt trans through CPO would make me feel better. Of course they said "no worries - no damage".
Anybody think I need to be concerned about driving it for about 100 miles with the wrong housing installed?
Hi everyone, new here, but I have a 1531 code for bank 1 and am limbering up to do this job -- maybe, I reserve the right to wimp out
A question for Rex probably:
I thought if you inserted to Porsche P9634 holding tool you could take off the cam cover without any prepositioning?
Another question: is the bank 1 easier than the bank 2? I got the impression from one of the Porsche Techs I spoke to briefly that that was the case: is there an oil scavange pump to remove on the bank 1 side as well?
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.