19 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH2nd gear popout issue class action suit
Leading reported evidence
Check (s) sent in 6 months ago
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I am still waiting for my 1st gen Ipod Nano class action law suit check(s) sent in 6 months ago.
Leading evidence: 'Check (s) sent in 6 months ago' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check (s) sent in 6 months ago' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
They lost, and my wife got a check for close to $20k a year later!
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
19 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T061840Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I ended up in one of these a while ago. A local realtor was accused of "forcing" buyers into their private escrow service or something. Fogot the exact details. When I received the formal paperwork (about 10 pages of really small type) it turned out the law firm made about 8 million. My cut was a $350 credit
if
I purchased a house within the year from the same realtor.
Gavels don't solve any mechanical issue... I get calls all the time from people wanting to take Porsche to Court because their engine failed... All it does is tell me the kind of persdonality they have and thats generally a red flag..
Been a member of several class action suits for years, never received a cent! Most were regarding buying and owning equities. The latest would offer me $.01633 or less than 2 cents for every share of an IPO I purchased in '99. I purchased 300 shares at $106.00 each or over $30K worth and would net less than $5.00 if the suit was won. Round file material, not worth reading past the second paragraph.
A woman that used to work with my wife at Smith Barney called her about 9 years ago. Asked her if she was aware of the discrimination class-action suit against SB. My wife said "no, what's the story?". Seems SB paid women less than men for the same jobs. They lost, and my wife got a check for close to $20k a year later!
So, some class action suits pay nicely!
i got that letter a few days ago too. seems there were a lot of subframes that cracked. i read about cracked subframes a few years ago on ghe E46 forums. it is pretty common, even on cars that were not modified.
there are articles in panorama about the factory re sleeving motors that failed the inital inspection because of demand and a broken machine at the factory, and plenty of talk about 996 motors blowing themselves up. yet when someone wants to hold the factory liable they are flamed here as crybabies.
