16 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHChinese Titaniumn Exhaust on ebay ???
Leading reported evidence
Run not walk away
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
You can always be the test case, but personally I would run, not walk away from this.
Leading evidence: 'Run not walk away' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run not walk away' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
You can always be the test case, but personally I would run, not walk away from this.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
16 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T194705Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
3. Precise
cast
flange (or
CNC machined
and
laser cutting machined
flange)
this is 3 very differant things all jumbled into one statement
cqhwaha( 0 )
hmmm.... no history of ever selling anything or shipping anything (though everyone had to start at (0) )
looks like a "stock" picture - I would like a real picture to see more detail, I'm not saying they are junk, but for my money to be spent, I would want to see those welds and know where the muffler parts came from, ect ect.....
Well, if it doesn't fit you can always just take it back to the supplier.
IN CHINA!!
From the pictures there is no way those tips are going to fit either a early or late 996 bumper. You can always be the test case, but personally I would run, not walk away from this. And who the hell needs a titanium exhasut anyway.
One questioner asked if it would fit a '99 996. The seller said "we've put them on '05 and '06 996's." Maybe China got those and we didn't (the '06 anyway - I know they did import some '05 996 4S's).
I guess I'm a loser.....I bid that bad boy up to a hunert, what the hey? (looked interesting) What's it up to now, $300+? I like the idea, two mufflers put together and kind of wondered why someone hadn't done that before....like, two mini glasspaks hooked up together.....$200. I'd buy a set for grins and giggles
considering knock off by-pass pipes go for over $150 - I think you are right... $200 for a "give em a shot" would be ok... wonder where they will end up
I am sorry but these and the italian version look like total junk. The tips are not rolled and both sets are not spaced the same. Also, like someone pointed out the interface to the cat pipes it totally wrong. WTF. On the other hand the link to the afterhours exhaust made by some guys on 6speed look very prof made.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
