14 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCH2000 996 recall
Reported or suspected cause
air bag warning light staring me in the face
Reported cause
No successful repair reported for this finding.
1
Identified cause
0
Suspected cause
0
Reported fixes
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that report identifying a cause
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Reported cause
After about 3 years of ownership I finally went in, but because it was the air bag warning light staring me in the face.
Check sticker.i signed up w/car-fax a few days ago
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I'll check for the sticker.I signed up w/car-fax a few days ago to check out another car and thought I'd run the 996 as well as my other cars,even though I've been told that their records are often inaccurate.It showed up as having 1 outstanding recall.I bought the car in 2002 but didn't find any service records related to a recall.Thanks everybody!
Leading evidence: 'air bag warning light staring me in the face' (1 discussions report identifying this cause; no attributable repair resolution). Across 1 matching discussions, the most frequently mentioned possible cause is 'air bag warning light staring me in the face' (1 discussions; 1 report identifying it and 0 suggest it). The most frequently discussed action is 'Check sticker.i signed up w/car-fax a few days ago' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I had the gas cap replaced as part of a recall...in 2002!
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
I ignored it as I had no problem with the switch, and it had been replaced the year before.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
A few months later a recall notice for the ignition switch was sent to him and he gave it to me, as I guess the DMV records used for the recall are not up to date.
These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.
Check sticker.i signed up w/car-fax a few days ago
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I'll check for the sticker.I signed up w/car-fax a few days ago to check out another car and thought I'd run the 996 as well as my other cars,even though I've been told that their records are often inaccurate.It showed up as having 1 outstanding recall.I bought the car in 2002 but didn't find any service records related to a recall.Thanks everybody!
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
A few months later a recall notice for the ignition switch was sent to him and he gave it to me, as I guess the DMV records used for the recall are not up to date.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Outcome without a verified action link
Guess it did not solve the emisssion issue as then the recall happened.
I was just informed that there has been a recall for my 2000 996.The recall is for an update of the DME fault software(recall #W201000) There is also a recall on the gas-cap.Has anyone had this done and do you know what the problem was? The local Porsche dealer seemed clueless about it.Thanks in advance
You should have received this info in the mail long ago. I can't recall what the problems were, but I don't think they affected driveability or safety. I had it taken care of at least two years ago.
Thanks Paul.I believe Ohio is about 2 years behind CA.in just about everything! Seriously, I just heard about the recall.The car drives fine and it will be snowing here soon anyway
Who told you there was a recall. Oops, I mean a service action.
Any dealer can punch in your VIN on a phone line and it will tell you of any recalls. Any service guy at a dealer can put your VIN in the computer and it will say it there is an open recall.
The gas cap replacement deal was years ago so it may have already been done. There should be a sticker on the engine lid if it was already done.
Prior to that the original orange gas cap seal was replace with the black version. Guess it did not solve the emisssion issue as then the recall happened.
Who or what informed you there was a recall? And, I guess, how do you know it has not already beeen taken care of?
Boxster gas cap sticker. Well, this is what they do in CA.
I'll check for the sticker.I signed up w/car-fax a few days ago to check out another car and thought I'd run the 996 as well as my other cars,even though I've been told that their records are often inaccurate.It showed up as having 1 outstanding recall.I bought the car in 2002 but didn't find any service records related to a recall.Thanks everybody!
Did not know Carfax had that info. It would be strange if your dealer did not want to run your VIN for any open recalls since they get paid by Porsche for taking care of it. You can always call Atlanta and ask them to do it for you. 1-800-PORSCHE
On a Boxster the gas cap recall sticker is not on the gas flap. It is above the emission sticker on the rear trunk lid. I assume the emission sticker on a 996 is on the rear engine lid. Look there.
Called Porsche and the gas cap and updated software were not handled by the previous owner for some reason, although the car is in exceptional shape.Hope it didn't hurt anything
I bought a 1997 Boxster in 1999 from a local owner. A few months later a recall notice for the ignition switch was sent to him and he gave it to me, as I guess the DMV records used for the recall are not up to date. I ignored it as I had no problem with the switch, and it had been replaced the year before.
Then more months or a year went by and Porsche sent me the same recall notice.
After about 3 years of ownership I finally went in, but because it was the air bag warning light staring me in the face. They punched in my VIN and I saw on the screen all the prior work that had been done on my car by the prior owner and that there was an open recall. So the switch was replaced again.
You did not hurt anything. But you have a funny dealer if they do not want to do recall work.
I have a feeling that this particular dealer sells and services far more Audis than Porsches.They just happen to be the dealer nearest me.My service work on my older P-cars is handled by a Porsche-only facility.Thank-you for your help.I'm sure everything is fine and the car only has 5,000 mi.so far.I just pray that there are no RMS problems down the line.Thank-you very much-----John
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.