30 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHPSS9's or H&R Coilovers?
Leading reported evidence
Adjust damping differently
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
The car now looks ride, handles right, and I have adjusted the damping differently for street driving and DE events.
Leading evidence: 'Adjust damping differently' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Adjust dampening' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
Almost like they barely changed the spring rates to compensate for the added weight
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
You can ADJUST the dampening to suit bad roads and highways and when you get to the track adjust the dampening for better handling.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Then you can adjust the dampening and have a nice smooth ride home after your track day.
Adjust things at the track, outside of tire pressure
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Nice to be dialed in out of the box, personally, I hate adjusting things at the track, outside of tire pressure.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Not adjustable, but then one of Gert's points was that most people are going to set PSS9 once and likely won't readjust it (and I think you have to re-balance the car everytime you change the settings).
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
Using just a shorter spring and a stock shock givers you a pogo effect and the car bounces around...The PSS9 has no pogo effect no matter where you set your dampening.
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
I've had no problems and use my car primarily on the street although it has been driven on the race track and autocross quite a few times for exercise.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
30 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T154520Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Before you ask, the application is:
Agressive Street Driving, some track time (advanced driving level), but only occasional (3-4 times a year)
Anyone driven both setups? Impressions?
Appreciate any input
PSS9's over the H&Rs anyday. I hate that silly "large" diameter spring in the front on the H&Rs but more so you're "stuck" with whatever dampening you get on the H&Rs. With the PSS9s you can adjust the dampening rate soft/harsh back and forth and customize it more to your own needs
That's the Porsche Sport Suspension. Pretty good as well but again non-adjustable. I prefer that to the H&Rs though. the last set of those we did had springs that were too stiff and shocks underdamped so you got a pogo effect
X74 is for the Narrow Body (C2/C4)
X73 is for the widebody (C4S/TT)
Since you said you wanted a more agressive suspension yet were not going to track more than 304 times yet want an agressive street setup, then the X73/74 is IMHO the way to go. Why? First of all, it is a factory part and I trust that the engineers know MORE about your car than does Bilstein or H&R.
There are many guys on the board that have done the X73/74 setup. Talk to (C4S Surgeon) and you will find out that it is worth every penny and then some.
PSS9....It actually can be setup for a SMOOTHER ride than stock, all at a lower ride height. The X73/X74 is not at all adjustable. The PSS9 is height adjustable as well as the shock dampening. So you can dial your car in to the way YOU like it. If the X73/4 isnt low enough or too low, tough. If the shocks are not stiff enough or too stiff, tough, thats it. And I dont think I have seen 1 negative PSS9 comment on any board, and everyone i know who has done it, loves it. Including me.
Bilstein has been making shocks for Porsches for quite a long time so I trust their that they are experts in this arena. The X73 and X74 are nice, but I wanted some adjustability so I went with the PSS9's. Even at a lower ride height, they ride better than the M030 suspension that came with my 40th. I've had no problems and use my car primarily on the street although it has been driven on the race track and autocross quite a few times for exercise.
X73/X74 is the Porsche competition suspension, the ultimate, unless you go motons. Pss9's are a 'street' oriented, one size fits all suspension, all bling imo. Mine measures 25.25, that's low enough for me, and the Porsche engineers. Too much adjustability isn't always a good thing at the track, esp in the hands of a neophyte to racing. Nice to be dialed in out of the box, personally, I hate adjusting things at the track, outside of tire pressure. Flame away...........................
I did extensive research when I had my 996 and was ordering X74, but it was out of stock, and I ended up trading for a 997S before I installed it. I spent a good half hour on the phone with Gert at Carnewal. Take a look at his website, where there is a link to some testimonials. Not adjustable, but then one of Gert's points was that most people are going to set PSS9 once and likely won't readjust it (and I think you have to re-balance the car everytime you change the settings).
Link:
http://www.carnewal-europe.com/cpx_p96079.htm
Question....The X73/X74 is sold for the US roads right? Some highways and streets are VERY bad and a TRUE track only suspension would have a HORRIBLE ride quality. So are you saying that this "Magic" suspension has a way of making roads driveable while giving race track handling? Then why didnt Porsche put this magic suspension on all cars? because there must be a compromise. Its not the ULTIMATE competition suspension. Either it is an excellent track suspension, or its an excellent street suspension UNLESS you have adjustability. This is where the PSS9's come into play. You can ADJUST the dampening to suit bad roads and highways and when you get to the track adjust the dampening for better handling. And it takes about 5 minutes to adjust the dampening. Then you can adjust the dampening and have a nice smooth ride home after your track day. PLUS...what suspension is good on every track in the world? One that has compromises. Suspension settings from track to track can vary greatly, so why is thi sthe ultimate suspension? How can the engineers in Germany make a suspension that is the best at Infineion and Laguna Seca as well as Mosport and Road Atlanta as well as Silverstone and Nurburgring? ITS IMPOSSIBLE...there must be adjustments made to fine tune the suspension to the driver and the track. The PSS9 gives you SOME of these adjustments allowing a more dialed in car. The GT3 suspension is the ultimate Porsche track suspension AND is known for being VERY unforgiving on the street. The X73/X74 are good suspensions, dont get me wrong, but for most the PSS9 is a better system.
newport......one reason and one reason only. There is no need for PAG to make a specific suspension for each track or one that is adjustible b/c you will NEVER be able to push the car to its limits in a manner that would be comensurate with a suspension system that you desire. 99% of us will never be at the level the cup car drivers are at and therefore do not need the ability to adjust in the manner they do from track to track. And most of that 1% that will (or is coming close) are on the track ALOT. Just cruise over to the GT3/GT2 board and you will find the answer to your question.
One question...Do you have or have you ever had PSS9 suspension? If not, then how can you really compare. Of course, I will say the same for PSS9 users. Most have not had both X73 and PSS9. So why are you constantly didssing PSS9 and saying thet are bling. You have no grounds for such a comment. OK to praise your X73/74, but lets not comment on that which you know not. BTW if Porsche engineers are so damn good, how come the stock suspension, shift kit, seats, etc. "amended...are not the best"?
I would not go so far as to say that the stock suspension, seats etc su*k and would highly disagree with that, a Chevy Cobalt would meet that. However that being said I WANT THE PSS9!
FWIW
I have had 3 different suspensions on my '03TT - Stock US, X73, and finally PSS9. My experience with these three has not been inexpensive, so I hope that you can learn from my experience. The X73's are well matched springs and shocks that bring your car to the proper look (height and rake). The downside that I discovered 10 minutes after leaving the shop for my first drive is that they were FARRRRRRRR to stiff for the roads, streets, and highways were I live in central Illinois. As I've gotten older, I probably am not willing to put up with such a harsh ride. It got so bad, that I caught myself bracing for the shock as I approached cracks, tar stripes, even shadows cast by telephone poles on the street. After two weeks, I reinstalled my OEM suspension.
Next up was PSS9's. The installation instructions from Bilstein leave a lot be desired. My shop misunderstood which OEM parts to reuse and which to discard. They left out the front upper strut thrust washer. As a result, the front springs would load up and release during slow turning maneuvers, creating a boing sound. I found a more competent shop to correct the problem and properly corner balance and set ride height. the height is roughly the same as the X73. The car now looks ride, handles right, and I have adjusted the damping differently for street driving and DE events. I am quite pleased, but this experience came at a significant cost as I climbed the learning curve.
If you live in a world of billiard table smooth streets and roads, go with the X73. It's plug and play. Otherwise PSS9 is the better choice.
Cheers,
At an under 60 mph autocross one can see the differences in adjustable suspension. ALSO PAG NOW DOES make an adjustable suspension. Its called PASM and its STANDARD on the 997 GT3 and an upgrade for all other Carreras...hmmmm....maybe Porsche is learning something. From what I have seen of porsche in the last 30 years is that they are LAST to include technology, but when they do it works VERY well...
well, just ordered the PSS9'ers, will be here Friday.
Thanks for all the input gentlemen. You've helped a newbie.
by the way, install is going on 00 C4 CPE, will post before and after as soon as available.
USS TT, I've yet to hear of anyone with a "narrowbody" 996 complain about PSS9s once they're dialed in for customer correctly. They seem to be a perfect match for the street and "some" tracking. For the C4S and TT (widebody 996s) some folks have lowered them too much and end up riding on the bumpstops whichs makes for unpredicatable handling obviously. For the X73/74 I honestly find it decent on the narrowbody but underdamped for the heavier wide body cars. Almost like they barely changed the spring rates to compensate for the added weight
The PSS9's obviously work well as many folks are quite happy with them, but it's kinda funny that one of their benefits as described by many is the ability to "dial down" (reduce) the damping while driving on the street. So I guess that makes them roughly equivalent to using H&R sport springs with the stock dampers (oversprung/underdamped) which is generally derided on this forum. Pretty funny.
Not at all...If you use H&R springs with stock shocks you are also shortening your shock travel. The PSS9 shocks are designed for the shortened springs. Your stock shocks are not. That is a big issue. If you use H&R springs with a SPORT shock you will get better results, but then you are getting close to PSS9 territory and why not spend a little for adjustability. Using just a shorter spring and a stock shock givers you a pogo effect and the car bounces around...The PSS9 has no pogo effect no matter where you set your dampening.
>>>>Not at all...If you use H&R springs with stock shocks you are also shortening your shock travel. The PSS9 shocks are designed for the shortened springs. Your stock shocks are not. That is a big issue. <<<<
Good point, as a H&R car sits, it's probably really close to touching the foam bump stops if not already touching.