fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Still think the 997 front end looks like a bug..

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
14 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHStill think the 997 front end looks like a bug..

Leading reported evidence

Clean lines

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

However, after seeing many 997's I can't help but love the simplicity and clean lines.

Still think the 997 front end looks like a bug..
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Clean lines' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Clean lines' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 14 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Frequently discussed actions (1)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Clean lines

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

However, after seeing many 997's I can't help but love the simplicity and clean lines.

Still think the 997 front end looks like a bug..
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

14 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

1 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Outcome without a verified action link

It also didn't help that the $80K+ 996 was confused by many with the $40K Boxster.

No unique explicit quoted action; no causal link assigned

Generation: 20261026T163944Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

I thought I would get over it.. but everytime i'm at the dealership, the front end still reminds me of a wider vw bug.. am i alone in the fact that i can't get over this?

POST 2Original post

The 997 front end has really grown on me. When I first saw it I had the same impression, actually it was more of just being underwhelmed. The 996 C4S and Turbo front end just looks more aggressive and detailed. However, after seeing many 997's I can't help but love the simplicity and clean lines. Of course most people think the 997 styling should have come after the 993, with the 996 coming after the 997... seems like more of a progression. You know, I haven't met a 911 I didn't like Rob

POST 3Original post

my sentiments exactly, well halfway. The design should be progression. Considering how cool the 911 Turbo headlights are, the 997 lights are big step backwards. The 997 Boxster is also bad, they more Japanesey to me now than German.

POST 4Original post

Yeah, but retro is in....look at the Mustang, Thunderbird, Prowler, that hideous Chevy truck thing, PT Cruiser, etc. I don't get it, they look horrible (the Mustang is the best one). Lazy design, kind of like all the F'in remakes Hollywood is doing

POST 5Original post

Ferdinand Porsche designed the Bug. The typical Porsche "face" (356,911) has usually been Bugish . I've grown to like the GT1-derived headlights, but really prefer the more traditional 987/997 look. Same as it ever was . . .

POST 6Original post

I really like the "lines" of the 997 but I hate the lights. I like the 996 light "cluster". It's neat and it works. The 997 lights -- while paying homage to the classic design -- is a step backwards. I think it is even worse for the 997 Turbo... the headlights are up top, the indicators and markers are on the air vents (for no good reason other than to differentiate it from the 997 and 997 S) and the fog lights are all the way in the bottom. In my opinion, it is a mess!

POST 7Original post

that chevy truck thing is called the HHR = Heritage High Roof As for the 997, the same remark could be said when the first Porsche 356 rolled off the assembly line.... it too looked like a beetle. So, I guess we all have to accept it - our granfathers did but i do agree with riad that somehow, the 996 front seems to be more of an evolution to the 997 front. But the classics are making a comeback. Likewise, in a decade or so, the 996 front end will probably return in some way or another.

POST 8Original post

an excellent point! all those remakes, mustang, Thunderbird, Charger, NONE are better than the originals, just watered down revisions. How will we have the next great Porsche design if we keep remaking the past? Leave the past where it belongs, behind you.

POST 9Original post

If you like remakes, get aload of the new Camaro they're coming out with... How the mighty have fallen...

POST 10Original post

what I would be concerned with the new turbo is hat thos lights on the bumper & vents will cost a lot more if they get broken in a very small fender bender.

POST 11Original post

Apart from the front spoiler looking "caymanish" I really hate the big wing. I think the car would look best with no wing at all. Looks like a tribute to the U.S. market just like the Cayenne. I know you guys are into putting wings in your C2+4's but here in Europe you never see anybody doing this mod. The bigger the wing, the bigger the pimp inside. Just my 2cts. Thorsten

POST 12Original post

LOL Poor Porsche just can't get it right. They were criticized for the 993 design because it was too conservative and looked too similar to older models. Then they were criticized for the 996 design for departing too radically from the traditional Porsche 911 design model. And now finally they are criticized again for returning to their traditional front end design. Personally I always liked the 996 front end, but all of my friends preferred the traditional 911 look. It also didn't help that the $80K+ 996 was confused by many with the $40K Boxster.

POST 13Original post

Why the didn't use the CGT light cluster is beyond me. All the high end cars have really great projector light assemblies. And I have to agree, the Boxster/Cayman trapezoidal light housing is just not doing it for me. I can handle the 997 lights but not a big fan of the bumper lights (base model and S) and REALLY don't care for the Knight Rider LED's in the air intakes and the wart of a fog light. No thanks. As programatore said, the 996 (pre and pos facelift) have great assemblies, fully integrated.

POST 14Original post

the 997 looks great ...never liked the huge headlights of the 996...got used to them, because I love the 911...but coming around and having round headlights again..best move they ever made...Jaguar had an overhaul in the 80tis...and it wasn't very successful, they also came back and made the car look almost like before with round headlights and the (sort of) triangle taillights, instead of the square head and taillights.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.