17 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHThunderhill pics
Leading reported evidence
Run 2 groups of 25 cars
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Run 2 groups of 25 cars' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run 2 groups of 25 cars' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
i want to maximize track time and GGLC sounds like it's it with only 3 run groups.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion
it's a lot of fun but ya, only 4-20 minute run sessions per day
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
17 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261026T122219Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
I only watched the first 3 laps, but IMHO if you take a later apex through turn 11, you can straighten out the esses in 12/13 so much that you will have to grab 4th before you fully track out onto the straight. You still have to turn in a tad on 12 ... and it works best if you turn in just a tad BEFORE you see the right side berm.
Using this technique, I was able to hold off a Lotus Exige in my 996 because he took an earlier apex on 11... the trick was keeping far enough ahead that he didn't realize what I was doing in 11... I'm pretty sure if he knew my line I'd a been toasted ...
Thanks for the info guys. This was my first time on track ever so I was slowing getting more aggressive as the day went on. BTW, my 996 is bone stock with PS2s (225/265). I am itching to get back on track and try out some track tips from Hank Watts.
http://www.pca-ggr.org/tthandbook/
Or if you actually want to spend time on track, get good instruction and spend less money there are at least half a dozen better groups to go with including:
http://www.hookedondriving.com/home.cfm
http://www.ncracing.org/
http://www.trackmasters-racing.com/
LOL. whatever high and mighty
what GGR has are the excellent instructors and camaraderie.
i agree with you though regarding the other organizations... great for tracking but i was referring to instructors. trackmasters is laughable and no opinion on HOD. NCRC instructors are great but i would suggest seeking out a porsche owner from the instructor core.
werd! nasa sux for hpde. too many cars on course (especially at sears point) and not much driving. if you want to step up to competitive TT and racing this may be the place to be, though.
my first event with GGLC will be at the upcoming LS event. i want to maximize track time and GGLC sounds like it's it with only 3 run groups. NCRC is great too... allowing you to run in lower groups.
haha, good one. i do the GGR events for the camaraderie and the TT series. it's a lot of fun but ya, only 4-20 minute run sessions per day
. i hope they change it.
GGLC is great if you know what you're doing & don't need instruction. Very little rules & regulations, it's all about getting tons of track time (and their prices are by far the lowest). They used to run 2 groups of 25 cars. Now it's 3 groups, but you can run in 2 out of the 3 groups almost all day (which is a little scary when you think about the slowest guys moving up a group and the fastest guys moving down a group...everyone on track with Group B).
The best NASA events are midweek at T-hill. Not many cars, tons of track time, cheap price. But it's an aggressive group, not really for newbs.
I really enjoyed the NCRC event I went to last year, they hold an exposition race, anyone can enter, great diverse group of cars, Ferrari, Mustang, Porsche, BMW, Neon SRT4, Caterham were some of the ones I recall being in the field.
I agree the NASA events are more aggresive, seems to be more for people going through the program to earn their race license.
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.