fullymatted.
Back to search
Rennlist

Thunderhill pics

Add to repair workspace
Open repair workspace
Original source
17 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW

Discussion summary

YOUR RESEARCHThunderhill pics

Leading reported evidence

Run 2 groups of 25 cars

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

They used to run 2 groups of 25 cars.

Thunderhill pics
Read full discussion summary

Leading evidence: 'Run 2 groups of 25 cars' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Run 2 groups of 25 cars' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.

Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.

Read captured replies

1 matching discussions · 17 captured posts examined · 0 partial discussions

Compare 2 other evidence results

Run groups

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

i want to maximize track time and GGLC sounds like it's it with only 3 run groups.

Thunderhill pics

Run sessions per day

Suggestion or failed attempt

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context

Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.

Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

it's a lot of fun but ya, only 4-20 minute run sessions per day

Thunderhill pics
Frequently discussed actions (3)

These are separate views of the same evidence. Frequency alone does not establish a fix, and these counts must not be added together.

Run 2 groups of 25 cars

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

They used to run 2 groups of 25 cars.

Thunderhill pics

Run groups

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

i want to maximize track time and GGLC sounds like it's it with only 3 run groups.

Thunderhill pics

Run sessions per day

No successful repair reported for this finding.

0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Discussions that contain suggestions
1

0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.

0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.

Suggestion

it's a lot of fun but ya, only 4-20 minute run sessions per day

Thunderhill pics
Coverage and how to read this overview

Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.

17 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.

  • Rennlist: 1 discussions

0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.

0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.

Generation: 20261026T122219Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources

POST 1 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Here are some pics of me at Thunderhill a few weeks ago (99 C2 w/lsd).

POST 2Original post

Very cool pictures. Got some video you can share? LSD: Did you car come with LSD or did you add it?

POST 3 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Here's my last full session of the day. http://video.google.com/videoplay?do...27207538&hl=en The LSD w/TC is factory.

POST 4Original post

Those pictures make me miss living in Northern California. This is from the last time I went there: http://www.johnc3d.com/racing/thillturn4lo.jpg

POST 5Original post

You shouldnt do drugs while driving, it affects your perception, just kidding I had to

POST 6Original post

Thanks for the pictures. Nice video. Your lines look good.

POST 7Original post

I only watched the first 3 laps, but IMHO if you take a later apex through turn 11, you can straighten out the esses in 12/13 so much that you will have to grab 4th before you fully track out onto the straight. You still have to turn in a tad on 12 ... and it works best if you turn in just a tad BEFORE you see the right side berm. Using this technique, I was able to hold off a Lotus Exige in my 996 because he took an earlier apex on 11... the trick was keeping far enough ahead that he didn't realize what I was doing in 11... I'm pretty sure if he knew my line I'd a been toasted ...

POST 8 / ORIGINAL POSTEROriginal post

Thanks for the info guys. This was my first time on track ever so I was slowing getting more aggressive as the day went on. BTW, my 996 is bone stock with PS2s (225/265). I am itching to get back on track and try out some track tips from Hank Watts. http://www.pca-ggr.org/tthandbook/

POST 9Original post

I did my first track day with TEAM racing at thunderhill too. Bonni organizes them well and it's a great group of people. You must have learned alot.

POST 10Original post

ALL READY HOOKED! great stuff. be sure to sign up with GGR. excellent instructors. see you around the norcal tracks.

POST 11Original post

Or if you actually want to spend time on track, get good instruction and spend less money there are at least half a dozen better groups to go with including: http://www.hookedondriving.com/home.cfm http://www.ncracing.org/ http://www.trackmasters-racing.com/

POST 12Original post

LOL. whatever high and mighty what GGR has are the excellent instructors and camaraderie. i agree with you though regarding the other organizations... great for tracking but i was referring to instructors. trackmasters is laughable and no opinion on HOD. NCRC instructors are great but i would suggest seeking out a porsche owner from the instructor core.

POST 13Original post

Laughable would be GGLC and probably NASA re instruction. GGR events may not be that much more expensive since you burn a lot less fuel...

POST 14Original post

werd! nasa sux for hpde. too many cars on course (especially at sears point) and not much driving. if you want to step up to competitive TT and racing this may be the place to be, though. my first event with GGLC will be at the upcoming LS event. i want to maximize track time and GGLC sounds like it's it with only 3 run groups. NCRC is great too... allowing you to run in lower groups. haha, good one. i do the GGR events for the camaraderie and the TT series. it's a lot of fun but ya, only 4-20 minute run sessions per day . i hope they change it.

POST 15Original post

GGLC is great if you know what you're doing & don't need instruction. Very little rules & regulations, it's all about getting tons of track time (and their prices are by far the lowest). They used to run 2 groups of 25 cars. Now it's 3 groups, but you can run in 2 out of the 3 groups almost all day (which is a little scary when you think about the slowest guys moving up a group and the fastest guys moving down a group...everyone on track with Group B). The best NASA events are midweek at T-hill. Not many cars, tons of track time, cheap price. But it's an aggressive group, not really for newbs.

POST 16Original post

They let you drive on that track with your sunroof open? Or is it closed?

POST 17Original post

I really enjoyed the NCRC event I went to last year, they hold an exposition race, anyone can enter, great diverse group of cars, Ferrari, Mustang, Porsche, BMW, Neon SRT4, Caterham were some of the ones I recall being in the field. I agree the NASA events are more aggresive, seems to be more for people going through the program to earn their race license.

This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.