4 captured repliesDiscussion pagination complete · Source accounts, not a confirmed diagnosis
THIS DISCUSSION / SOURCE-DERIVED OVERVIEW
Discussion summary
YOUR RESEARCHI Sprung a Leak
Leading reported evidence
Use jg xp9
Performed · outcome unconfirmed
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that performed work without a confirmed outcome
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Leading evidence: 'Use jg xp9' (no explicit attributable resolution; this is a reported action or suggestion). Across 1 matching discussions, The most frequently discussed action is 'Check couple of hours later' (1 discussions). For that action, 0 discussions report a resolution and 0 report an unsuccessful attempt. No action has an explicit, attributable resolution report under the current rules. These are forum reports and suggestions, not a confirmed diagnosis.
Source reports, not a diagnosis or a success probability. Counts refer to discussions and can overlap.
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
I pull back into my garage, and check a couple of hours later.
Check their levels and both are about where they were
Suggestion or failed attempt
No successful repair reported for this finding.
0
Reported fixes
0
Unsuccessful attempts
1
Discussions
Read evidence and context
Explicit resolution reports before identified causes, performed actions and suggestions. Within each level, matching component labels precede direct query mentions and inherited thread context; successful versus unsuccessful discussion counts, owner confirmations and independent discussion support determine order. This is not a probability of success.
Discussions that contain suggestions
1
0 original-poster resolution reports. Counts can overlap; they are not unique people or a success rate.
0 discussions have direct query context; 0 report a fix in that context. Other evidence may inherit the discussion’s subject.
Suggestion · Original poster
But I check their levels and both are about where they were before the weekend.
Counts describe captured discussions, not unique people or a diagnosis. Author identities are not reliably stored. Exact duplicate evidence is counted once across matching discussions; one discussion counts at most once per action/state. Multiple repairs reported together remain a combination. Suggestions and failed attempts do not establish a fix. Matches cover whole discussions and can include related faults, model variants and incomplete threads.
4 eligible posts · 0 unverified posts · 1 discussions match the subject in their title or opening post.
Rennlist: 1 discussions
0 evidence records excluded for query context · 0 excluded by outcome qualification · 0 adjusted by outcome qualification.
0 acknowledgements have no verified action link; they do not establish a repair result.
Generation: 20261027T154520Z · outcome-qualification-6. Deterministic extraction; no AI model inference. How we use sources
Hello fine Sirs,
May I first say that within the last month I have done my first autocross, and my first DE weekend. Talk about amazing eye opening experiences. If you haven't done this, you NEED to. It will teach you so much about what your car can do. These are amazing machines. I have tapped into about 40% of my cars potential even after an entire weekend of tracking.
The most counterintuitive concept for me is accelerating out of a turn. As a field of grass is quickly approaching, and my tires are starting to squeal, every fiber of my being, based on the last 25 years of driving, is to let off the accelerator and hit the brake. But there is my instructor next to me, yelling at the top of his lungs "GAS GAS GAS, MORE GAS". Shifting the weight to the back of the car to power through a turn will take some mental adjustment. Exciting and terrifying stuff!
Ok, now my mandatory newbie question. I noticed no leaks while at the track. I pull back into my garage, and check a couple of hours later. There is a puddle in the vicinity of the battery. I felt it and smelled it. It doesn't smell and it's clear besides some dirt. My break fluid and coolant don't smell much, so I assume it's one of those. But I check their levels and both are about where they were before the weekend. What could it be? My windshield fluid has a nice flowery smell so it's not that. If it were battery fluid, wouldn't it have come out on the track? Why after a peaceful ride home? Any easy litmus type tests I can perform to find out what liquid it is?
Thanks for any thoughts.
PS for KK. Yes, I used JG XP9 for my track days.
Engine has so far not blown up!
This was a pretty substantial amount of fluid. A lot more than I have ever seen before. But I guess it's possible since it was a long drive home. I also saw fluid on the small pipes/lines under the passenger door. Would a/c condensation spread there as well?
This is a source reference. Confirm exact model applicability in the original material.
